<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Vishwa Kumbalimutt's blog - All Comments</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/vishwa/</link><description /><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Tuning SCVMM for VDI deployments</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/vishwa/archive/2011/02/01/tuning-scvmm-for-vdi-deployments.aspx#3507289</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 19:14:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3507289</guid><dc:creator>HeyAdmin</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m curious about tuning SCVMM for branch office scenarios. &amp;nbsp;We have an SCVMM server at headquarters and Windows Server 2008 R2 Core servers running Hyper-V in each branch office. &amp;nbsp;We are managing everything with SCVMM. &amp;nbsp;It appears there&amp;#39;s quite a bit of traffic generated between the core servers in the branch offices and the SCVMM server. &amp;nbsp;The offending process appears to be vmmservice.exe. &amp;nbsp;There are multiple threads for the process, each one communicating with one of the core servers. &amp;nbsp;Total utilization per thread ranges from a few hundred bps to 50kbps. &amp;nbsp;I have changed automatic library refresh interval from 1 to 12 hours, but I reckon this process is getting data from the vmm agents about vm status, host status, and such. &amp;nbsp;Is that right, and is there a way to tune it down to reduce bandwidth utilization? &amp;nbsp;Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3507289" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Tuning SCVMM for VDI deployments</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/vishwa/archive/2011/02/01/tuning-scvmm-for-vdi-deployments.aspx#3492514</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 00:31:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3492514</guid><dc:creator>Matt Evans</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Same question as Ronnie. Do you need to make these changes in SCVMM 2012 also?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3492514" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Tuning SCVMM for VDI deployments</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/vishwa/archive/2011/02/01/tuning-scvmm-for-vdi-deployments.aspx#3465368</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:26:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3465368</guid><dc:creator>Ronnie</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post, any news on VDI for SCVMM2012?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3465368" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Tuning SCVMM for VDI deployments</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/vishwa/archive/2011/02/01/tuning-scvmm-for-vdi-deployments.aspx#3456090</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:12:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3456090</guid><dc:creator>Turbofroggy</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;These two registry keys are not recommended at the 120 minute interval. &amp;nbsp;The SCVMM advisor states that these should be set or 600 minutes not 120 minutes:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;VMUpdateInterval - Periodic VM refresher&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;30 min&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;0&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;24 hr&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;120 mins&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7200&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;HostUpdateInterval - Host and User Role Refresher&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;30 min&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;0&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;24 hr&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;120 mins&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3456090" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Tuning SCVMM for VDI deployments</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/vishwa/archive/2011/02/01/tuning-scvmm-for-vdi-deployments.aspx#3392506</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 14:32:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3392506</guid><dc:creator>Patrick Rouse</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Vishwa, below is a link to some testing Quest did with Microsoft at the EEC in Redmond as it pertains to scalability of vWorkspace and SCVMM:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.quest.com/documents/landing.aspx?id=12860"&gt;www.quest.com/.../landing.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;ve also included some demonstrations of vWorkspace Rapid Virtual Desktop Provisioning with SCVMM:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHnL2Ge0Wpc"&gt;www.youtube.com/watch&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wZHzamGt1Y"&gt;www.youtube.com/watch&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3392506" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>