<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Windows Server virtualization at WinHEC</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/virtualization/archive/2006/05/23/429897.aspx</link><description>Hello and welcome to the Microsoft virtual machine team’s blog! On Monday the 22nd, as part of the WinHEC conference, we announced the next steps in our virtualization strategy and outlined our roadmap of products. As we march towards release, we are</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>Virtual Server Core</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/virtualization/archive/2006/05/23/429897.aspx#1482566</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 11:02:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:1482566</guid><dc:creator>The things that are better left unspoken</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;In my opinion Windows Server 2008 Server Core servers are perfect for virtualization. They don't eat&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1482566" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Windows Server virtualization - a perfect stocking stuffer</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/virtualization/archive/2006/05/23/429897.aspx#566382</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 21:24:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:566382</guid><dc:creator>Windows Server Division WebLog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Twas the week before Christmas and all through Redmond, not a creature was stirring ... except for the Windows Server virtualization development team. These folks gave some select system partners early bits (private beta) of Windows Server virtualization&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=566382" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Why Virtualization is so darn popular</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/virtualization/archive/2006/05/23/429897.aspx#448665</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 22:37:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:448665</guid><dc:creator>Port 25</dc:creator><description>Just returning from Linux World in San Francisco, and virtualization was once again the topic du jour. &amp;nbsp;A lot of you outside of the technology vendor-sphere (where we like to speak in weird acronyms and corporate buzzwords), might wonder why Microsoft&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=448665" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>