Microsoft RemoteFX: Closing the User Experience Gap

re: Microsoft RemoteFX: Closing the User Experience Gap

XPisDead — Fri, 02 Jul 2010 12:31:06 GMT

Please DO NOT provide a 64-bit XP and 2003 TS client for this. People need to grow up and start using a big boy OS.

Providing a crutch to NT5 users is just another way for them to keep using legacy hardware and solutions. I bet you guys have a 10/100 LAN all running on a 2003 single box architecture.

@Adam

Quit promoting your stupid product. Nobody cares, if they did they would write a whole article on your software.

re: Microsoft RemoteFX: Closing the User Experience Gap

Adam — Fri, 25 Jun 2010 08:53:34 GMT

RemoteFX will certainly deliver a premium user experience for LAN users accessing rich media content and 3D applications, from virtual and session-based desktops. For access over slow WANs though, organizations that want to enable access for remote users should seriously consider complementing it with Ericom Software’s solution for improving RDP performance, especially over slow WANs.

Ericom Blaze is a software-based RDP acceleration and compression product. It accelerates RDP by up to 25x and is ideal for remote users connecting over slow WANs who need to access graphics-rich content and applications. It works with any standard RDP host, including VDI, Terminal Servers and remote physical machines.

Read more about Blaze and download a free evaluation at:

www.ericom.com/ericom_blaze.asp

Or view a video demo at:

www.ericom.com/blaze_youtube.asp

Adam

re: Microsoft RemoteFX: Closing the User Experience Gap

Casperk — Tue, 01 Jun 2010 13:09:12 GMT

Does this mean that you will finally be able to run CUDA programs over remote desktop?

re: Microsoft RemoteFX: Closing the User Experience Gap

gillette — Mon, 10 May 2010 10:18:54 GMT

Hi, Max Herrmann, how to contact you. I have some question about Microsoft RemoteFX solution is to redirect devices at the USB level.

re: Microsoft RemoteFX: Closing the User Experience Gap

kfsone — Tue, 27 Apr 2010 14:13:55 GMT

This still leaves wide open the desktop-desktop virtualization niche where users need bare-metal access to local hardware such as a GPU restricted to specific host/guest operating systems. For example, DirectX developers generally have to build multiple physical machines for testing functionality on different vendor's GPUs, rather than connecting two physical GPUs to one workstation...

re: Microsoft RemoteFX: Closing the User Experience Gap

anony.muos — Tue, 27 Apr 2010 03:26:54 GMT

But please provide a 64-bit XP and Server 2003 TS client.