<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>City of Frisco (Texas) saves big with Hyper-V and NetApp</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/virtualization/archive/2009/12/01/city-of-frisco-texas-saves-big-with-hyper-v-and-netapp.aspx</link><description>A great example of why companies are adopting virtualization and the resulting benefits can be seen in Texas, at the City of Frisco. The city, one of the fastest growing in America, needed to scale a siloed IT infrastructure to accommodate data growth</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: City of Frisco (Texas) saves big with Hyper-V and NetApp</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/virtualization/archive/2009/12/01/city-of-frisco-texas-saves-big-with-hyper-v-and-netapp.aspx#3300157</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 01:52:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3300157</guid><dc:creator>ultimahosts.net</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Awesome! Is there any reason why an organization wouldn't virtualize with Hyper-V? I can't see any reason for a bare-bones install anymore.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3300157" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>