Hypervisor Footprint Debate Part 2: Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V & VMware ESX 3.5http://blogs.technet.com/b/virtualization/archive/2009/08/14/hypervisor-footprint-debate-part-2-windows-server-2008-hyper-v-vmware-esx-3-5.aspxVirtualization Nation, In part 1 of this series , I started an in depth analysis tackling VMware’s claims head on that because their disk footprint is smaller and ESX/ESXi are single purpose hypervisors, they are therefore more secure. The Thin Hypervisoren-USTelligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)re: Hypervisor Footprint Debate Part 2: Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V & VMware ESX 3.5http://blogs.technet.com/b/virtualization/archive/2009/08/14/hypervisor-footprint-debate-part-2-windows-server-2008-hyper-v-vmware-esx-3-5.aspx#3294721Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:57:51 GMTd5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3294721otomatik kapı<p>I liked your article very thanks</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3294721" width="1" height="1">re: Hypervisor Footprint Debate Part 2: Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V & VMware ESX 3.5http://blogs.technet.com/b/virtualization/archive/2009/08/14/hypervisor-footprint-debate-part-2-windows-server-2008-hyper-v-vmware-esx-3-5.aspx#3274428Tue, 18 Aug 2009 03:58:48 GMTd5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3274428sbramfit<p>Cue the trained chorus of sheep bleating &quot;Small disk footprint good, big patch footprint better!&quot;</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3274428" width="1" height="1">re: Hypervisor Footprint Debate Part 2: Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V & VMware ESX 3.5http://blogs.technet.com/b/virtualization/archive/2009/08/14/hypervisor-footprint-debate-part-2-windows-server-2008-hyper-v-vmware-esx-3-5.aspx#3274414Tue, 18 Aug 2009 02:46:22 GMTd5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3274414SJB<p>Nope Philip, I am also confused. &nbsp;Seems to be a massive amoung of copy/paste in this post.</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3274414" width="1" height="1">re: Hypervisor Footprint Debate Part 2: Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V & VMware ESX 3.5http://blogs.technet.com/b/virtualization/archive/2009/08/14/hypervisor-footprint-debate-part-2-windows-server-2008-hyper-v-vmware-esx-3-5.aspx#3274105Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:58:07 GMTd5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3274105pcolmer<p>Did you unintentionally copy &amp; paste too much from part 1? I really enjoyed reading part 1, but this posting didn't seem to have much new information.</p> <p>Or have I misread the blog?</p> <p>--Philip</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3274105" width="1" height="1">