<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Beware The VMware Core Tax &amp; More</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/virtualization/archive/2009/06/28/beware-the-vmware-core-tax-and-more.aspx</link><description>Virtualization Nation, 
 We'd like to again offer congratulations to AMD on the release of their new 6-core Opteron ("Istanbul") processors . As Bryon mentioned , Hyper-V R2 goes hand in hand with these new processors with support for AMD's Rapid Virtualization</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Beware The VMware Core Tax &amp; More</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/virtualization/archive/2009/06/28/beware-the-vmware-core-tax-and-more.aspx#3295488</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:41:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3295488</guid><dc:creator>otomatik kapı</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;article was very good offer my thanks&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3295488" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Beware The VMware Core Tax &amp; More</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/virtualization/archive/2009/06/28/beware-the-vmware-core-tax-and-more.aspx#3259986</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:17:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3259986</guid><dc:creator>bowulf</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;This is the one issue that I think Microsoft has a legitimate leg up on VMware, and if VMW doesn't change its stance, it will stand to lose a number of long standing customers as they are either forced into buy suboptimal servers to stay within their ELA or as Scott says be forced into a $295 upgrade fee per license. &amp;nbsp;Renegogiating the ELA after the fact? &amp;nbsp;vSphere 5 might be out before that.... &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The other benefits of a Enterprise Plus don't hold as much angst as this cores per socket issue. &amp;nbsp;The good news is it is still theoretical issue without 8/12/16 core processors on the market. &amp;nbsp;VMW could indeed do the right thing like they did in 2005 when dual cores came out.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3259986" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Beware The VMware Core Tax &amp; More</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/virtualization/archive/2009/06/28/beware-the-vmware-core-tax-and-more.aspx#3259709</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:45:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3259709</guid><dc:creator>Trevor Sullivan</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm really, REALLY looking forward to the Cluster Shared Volumes (CSV) support in Windows 2008 R2! That's going to be one kick-@$$ feature! :)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-Trevor&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3259709" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>