<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>So you have VMware deployed – Why not consider exploring Microsoft Virtualization</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/uspartner_ts2team/archive/2010/06/23/so-you-have-vmware-deployed-why-not-consider-exploring-microsoft-virtualization.aspx</link><description>&amp;#160; So you have VMware deployed and you're happy with it; why not consider Microsoft Virtualization.&amp;#160; Integrating Microsoft Virtualization with existing VMware deployments is not “Rip and Replace”.&amp;#160; What about Cost differentials?&amp;#160; Can</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator></channel></rss>