<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>What are the hardware requirements for a combined Exchange 2010 HUB/CAS role?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/ucedsg/archive/2010/02/25/what-are-the-hardware-requirements-for-a-combined-exchange-2010-hub-cas-role.aspx</link><description>I was asked this by a school district in Minneapolis that was deploying Exchange 2010.&amp;#160; I have seen this becoming a popular deployment option since CAS is proc heavy (3 proc cores for every 4 mailbox proc cores) and Hub is not as proc heavy (1 proc</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: What are the hardware requirements for a combined Exchange 2010 HUB/CAS role?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/ucedsg/archive/2010/02/25/what-are-the-hardware-requirements-for-a-combined-exchange-2010-hub-cas-role.aspx#3432119</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 17:50:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3432119</guid><dc:creator>Michael Bell</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Perfect. We combined these two roles in 2007 and are planning on doing the same thing in 2010. This information is not only timely, but extremely useful. Thanks! &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3432119" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>