<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>What is new with Exchange 2010 storage?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/ucedsg/archive/2009/05/11/what-is-new-with-exchange-2010-storage.aspx</link><description>Is there any reduction in IOPS? Yes, another huge 70% reduction in IOPS with Exchange Server 2010. This is on top of the 70% IOPS reduction from Exchange Server 2007.&amp;#160; What does this mean for my storage requirements? The Exchange 2007 IOPS reduction</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: What is new with Exchange 2010 storage?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/ucedsg/archive/2009/05/11/what-is-new-with-exchange-2010-storage.aspx#3388084</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 19:45:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3388084</guid><dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;In that case have you considered longer &amp;quot;deleted item retention&amp;quot; window? The default is 14 days. Maiking it longer will enable the users to help themselves.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3388084" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: What is new with Exchange 2010 storage?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/ucedsg/archive/2009/05/11/what-is-new-with-exchange-2010-storage.aspx#3311126</link><pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 10:28:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3311126</guid><dc:creator>Anand_N</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I still need to take backups in the event a user wishes to restore email that was deleted weeks ago and has passed the retention period time for the database deleted items.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3311126" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: What is new with Exchange 2010 storage?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/ucedsg/archive/2009/05/11/what-is-new-with-exchange-2010-storage.aspx#3280927</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:57:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3280927</guid><dc:creator>markga</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;My understanding is VSS is going to be the primary backup offering as streaming backups are no longer a part of Exchange 2010. It will be up to each backup vendor to provide a VSS Exchange solution.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That being said, I know internally we are looking to move away from traditional backups entirely and go with JBOD SATA with a DAG (multi DB replica) solution.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3280927" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: What is new with Exchange 2010 storage?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/ucedsg/archive/2009/05/11/what-is-new-with-exchange-2010-storage.aspx#3280780</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:51:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3280780</guid><dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Which backup procedures are availabl, in addition to the application level replication of data?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3280780" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: What is new with Exchange 2010 storage?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/ucedsg/archive/2009/05/11/what-is-new-with-exchange-2010-storage.aspx#3280779</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:51:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3280779</guid><dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Which backup procedures are availabl, in addition to the application level replication of data? Much like EdgeSafe?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3280779" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: What is new with Exchange 2010 storage?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/ucedsg/archive/2009/05/11/what-is-new-with-exchange-2010-storage.aspx#3260021</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:44:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3260021</guid><dc:creator>GregK</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Our point is that with these new technologies RAID isn't the only game in town and you can have multiple copies of data. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3260021" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: What is new with Exchange 2010 storage?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/ucedsg/archive/2009/05/11/what-is-new-with-exchange-2010-storage.aspx#3260005</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:48:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3260005</guid><dc:creator>AN</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh dear - &amp;quot;RAID disk sets adds little value or unnecessary additional performance.image&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Until you're having to copy it back after a failure.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Then you're contending for CPU, IO controller and disk head with the running Exchange server and Windows usual overheads.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These &amp;quot;solutions&amp;quot; are all very well until things break and then they fall apart very quickly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3260005" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>What’s new? Exchange 2010 storage.</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/ucedsg/archive/2009/05/11/what-is-new-with-exchange-2010-storage.aspx#3246548</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 07:25:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3246548</guid><dc:creator>Unified Communications (대한민국)</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;원본은 여기 를 클릭하면 볼 수 있습니다. IOPS가 감소되었나요? 네, Exchange 2007에 비해서 70%의 IOPS가 감소되었습니다. What does this mean for&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3246548" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>What is new with Exchange 2010 storage?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/ucedsg/archive/2009/05/11/what-is-new-with-exchange-2010-storage.aspx#3239170</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 23:33:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3239170</guid><dc:creator>Blogs from the Microsoft Field</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Is there any reduction in IOPS? Yes, another huge 70% reduction in IOPS with Exchange Server 2010. This&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3239170" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>