<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Blogs Have "Tipped"?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/tonyso/archive/2006/10/19/blogs-have-tipped.aspx</link><description>A few months ago, internal discussion revolved around IT Pro customer perception of the information in blogs (specifically blogs.technet.com and blogs.msdn.com) in relation to KB and other "official" sources. Was it "valuable"? Was it "authoritative"</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>YES: Blogs Have "Tipped"?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/tonyso/archive/2006/10/19/blogs-have-tipped.aspx#477752</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 07:17:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:477752</guid><dc:creator>Dugie</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Tony, They sure have! &amp;nbsp;I find the technet blogs are far more valuable than the the official sources. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Don't get me wrong, official sources are still good -- but your regular TechNet bloggers give the answers we need, through a medium we can trust, and we get the answers now. &amp;nbsp;Its a win-win.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[QUACK!!] &amp;nbsp;:)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=477752" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>