<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The Case of the Pending VM Snapshot Merge</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/tonyso/archive/2010/11/25/the-case-of-the-pending-vm-snapshot-merge.aspx</link><description>The case of the pending merge. Guest post from reader Jeremy Hagan Recently I had a virtual machine stop responding. Upon investigation I noticed that the machine was paused. This usually happens when the underlying disk has run out of space and it was</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: The Case of the Pending VM Snapshot Merge</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/tonyso/archive/2010/11/25/the-case-of-the-pending-vm-snapshot-merge.aspx#3371639</link><pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 12:37:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3371639</guid><dc:creator>Hans Vredevoort</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice article!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We once needed an emergency exit for a similar delayed merge of multiple and prolonged Hyper-V snapshots, but were unable to grow the underlying disk to allow the merge to complete. It would have taken very long to go that route.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We found disk2vhd.exe a very useful tool and were able to create fresh VHD&amp;#39;s from within the VM. All we had to do was recreate the VM and add it back to the cluster.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hans Vredevoort&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cluster MVP&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="Http://hyperv.nu/blogs/hans"&gt;Http://hyperv.nu/blogs/hans&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="Http://www.twitter.com/hvredevoort"&gt;www.twitter.com/hvredevoort&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3371639" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: The Case of the Pending VM Snapshot Merge</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/tonyso/archive/2010/11/25/the-case-of-the-pending-vm-snapshot-merge.aspx#3371312</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 20:16:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3371312</guid><dc:creator>Alexander Trofimov</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;We have just decided to monitor .avhd files existence and put the process for planning downtime as soon as a snapshot is created. Snapshots are not a backup tool so it is ok for us to totally remove it after it was created =) &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3371312" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>