<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Gamerzrul: Why the Wiki Will Win (part two)</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/tonyso/archive/2010/08/18/gamerzrul-why-the-wiki-will-win-part-two.aspx</link><description>The killer app for user-created content is games. Game devotees are invested in the experience to the extent that it allows them to feel “I created this experience.” This helps us somewhat get over some terrible user experience design issues: There are</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Gamerzrul: Why the Wiki Will Win (part two)</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/tonyso/archive/2010/08/18/gamerzrul-why-the-wiki-will-win-part-two.aspx#3351376</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 14:36:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3351376</guid><dc:creator>IL</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;IMO, it is a very good point for technical correctness - &amp;quot;demonstrably correct&amp;quot; or verification by demoing it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3351376" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Gamerzrul: Why the Wiki Will Win (part two)</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/tonyso/archive/2010/08/18/gamerzrul-why-the-wiki-will-win-part-two.aspx#3350889</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 15:38:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3350889</guid><dc:creator>tonysoper_MSFT</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your comment. Partly it is a trust issue - some Microsoft employees have contributed non-technical content and technical content to Wikipedia only to have their content rejected as &amp;quot;biased&amp;quot;. Microsoft policy is that when you are acting in community, to identify yourself as a Microsoft employee if that might be an issue. Many think wikipedia is not focused on the technology audience. We thought we could better solve these problems with a wiki that is open to everyone, including Microsoft employees, that is interested in sharing information on using Microsoft products. I hope you give it a try and find it useful.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3350889" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Gamerzrul: Why the Wiki Will Win (part two)</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/tonyso/archive/2010/08/18/gamerzrul-why-the-wiki-will-win-part-two.aspx#3350870</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 13:46:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3350870</guid><dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I see your argument for a TechNet wiki as valid, there are a lot of IT related wikis, Samba&amp;#39;s wiki comes to mind. &amp;nbsp;Is there some question as to why technical content shouldn&amp;#39;t be posted on Wikipedia?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3350870" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>