<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The Private Cloud Man - All Comments</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/tomshinder/</link><description>Private Cloud Technologies, Architecture and more!</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: DirectAccess Client Location Awareness – NRPT Name Resolution</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/tomshinder/archive/2010/04/02/directaccess-client-location-awareness-nrpt-name-resolution.aspx#3571085</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 07:46:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3571085</guid><dc:creator>khaled</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;this is a very fragile setup for direct access then , since if im enabling this to branch offices or even my local office , im limiting my resources availability to one server &amp;quot;nls&amp;quot; ! what will happen if the wan link was down the branch offices wont be able to connect to their local servers ?? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;and even on the local office if the whol nls server was down then the clients wont connect to the local network in this case !&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3571085" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Why are both the Teredo and IP-HTTPS Interfaces Active?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/tomshinder/archive/2010/08/24/why-are-both-the-teredo-and-ip-https-interfaces-active.aspx#3569681</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 15:23:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3569681</guid><dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;nice article, now it would be good to say how to avoid this. Teredo outperforms IPHTTPS so there should be a fix which will prevent this to happen. If its possible to use Teredo it must be used.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3569681" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Troubleshooting the “No Usable Certificate(s)” IP-HTTPS Client Error</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/tomshinder/archive/2010/03/30/troubleshooting-the-no-usable-certificate-s-ip-https-client-error.aspx#3568476</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 10:26:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3568476</guid><dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Tom,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Should SAN DNS attribute also work across forests? Or is UPN required?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3568476" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Configuring DirectAccess to Support Citrix Connections</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/tomshinder/archive/2010/08/24/configuring-directaccess-to-support-citrix-connections.aspx#3559337</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:35:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3559337</guid><dc:creator>cmh</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Does anyone know if this works for the Access Gateway Enterprise platform or netscaler as well? &amp;nbsp;Also the link to the CSG section above appears to be dead:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In configuring the CSG, note should be taken in &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://support.citrix.com/proddocs/index.jsp?lang=en&amp;amp;topic=/xenapp5fp-w2k8/sg-features-v2.html"&gt;support.citrix.com/.../index.jsp&lt;/a&gt; to use the IPv6 address to listen on. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m not sure what you mean by the IPv6 address that needs to be listened on... was hoping a traditional Access Gateway Enterprise/Web Interface implementation would work without too much reconfiguration.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3559337" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: DirectAccess Client Location Awareness – NRPT Name Resolution</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/tomshinder/archive/2010/04/02/directaccess-client-location-awareness-nrpt-name-resolution.aspx#3558178</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 20:04:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3558178</guid><dc:creator>Renato Marson Pagan</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Tom, great article. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3558178" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Configuring DirectAccess to Support Citrix Connections</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/tomshinder/archive/2010/08/24/configuring-directaccess-to-support-citrix-connections.aspx#3553601</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:26:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3553601</guid><dc:creator>vj</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello Sir&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I tried this on server 2012 but dns fails when i put it in the nrpt rules&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;pls advise&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3553601" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Choosing Between Forefront TMG or Forefront UAG for Publishing Scenarios</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/tomshinder/archive/2011/04/19/choosing-between-forefront-tmg-or-forefront-uag-for-publishing-scenarios.aspx#3547568</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 19:06:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3547568</guid><dc:creator>Jabberwocq</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Agreed about UAG SP2. This table needs to be revised accordingly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3547568" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Use a HOSTS File Entry to Control ISATAP Host Configuration</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/tomshinder/archive/2011/02/14/use-a-hosts-file-entry-to-control-isatap-host-configuration.aspx#3539454</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 14:41:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3539454</guid><dc:creator>Thomas W Shinder - MSFT</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Arun - what problems are you having with the HOSTS file?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3539454" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Use a HOSTS File Entry to Control ISATAP Host Configuration</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/tomshinder/archive/2011/02/14/use-a-hosts-file-entry-to-control-isatap-host-configuration.aspx#3539408</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 10:37:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3539408</guid><dc:creator>Arun</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;i want to use the host file..he is want connect the server..i want explen you...expert&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3539408" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: UAG DirectAccess "The adapter configured as external-facing is connected to a domain"</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/tomshinder/archive/2010/05/27/uag-directaccess-quot-the-adapter-configured-as-external-facing-is-connected-to-a-domain-quot.aspx#3538462</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 16:31:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3538462</guid><dc:creator>Thomas W Shinder - MSFT</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Having had a chance to work with Server Essentails. What type of deployment are you working on? The simplified behind a NAT? Thanks! -Tom&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3538462" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>