<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>System Center in Action - All Comments</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/system_center_in_action/</link><description>Discover System Center best practices and real-world experience in action. You’ll find collective experiences of a team that designs, operates, and showcases industry-standard, production implementations of System Center client and server management soluti</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Understanding Updates Management</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/system_center_in_action/archive/2011/05/02/test.aspx#3561656</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 20:46:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3561656</guid><dc:creator>Ankit Goel</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello Jiten, &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This article is useful however would like to know about part 2 also.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ankit&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3561656" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Configuration Manager 2012 Exchange Connector Implementation in Microsoft IT</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/system_center_in_action/archive/2011/09/02/configuration-manager-2012-exchange-connector-implementation-in-microsoft-it.aspx#3554312</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 01:35:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3554312</guid><dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Quick question, If I have configured read only as you have, but an administrator tries to send a device block, this request appears to get stuck in retry as it doesnt have permissions to execute. How do I now clear this from retry?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3554312" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Client Migration from Configuration Manager 2007 to Configuration Manager 2012</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/system_center_in_action/archive/2012/01/14/client-migration-blog.aspx#3524500</link><pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2012 06:21:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3524500</guid><dc:creator>Nsikak Attah</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi, I&amp;#39;m wondering if using software distribution using existing config manager 2007 with appropriate command line options would not have achieved same objective especially for sites that don&amp;#39;t have the luxury of fast links to remote locations&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3524500" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Understanding Updates Management</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/system_center_in_action/archive/2011/05/02/test.aspx#3523501</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 12:18:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3523501</guid><dc:creator>JitenRK</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;You can find LastScanState Message ID under the view v_StateNames.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3523501" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Understanding Updates Management</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/system_center_in_action/archive/2011/05/02/test.aspx#3520257</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 19:22:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3520257</guid><dc:creator>CMJ</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;How would I convert the LastScanState Message ID to an actual useful description? &amp;nbsp;I cant seem to find the associated table.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3520257" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Extending Incident Properties and Forms</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/system_center_in_action/archive/2011/04/26/extending-incident-properties-and-forms.aspx#3517887</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 13:18:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3517887</guid><dc:creator>Forms</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Forms need to possess best properties, because it helps in analyzing the data easily, which results in success and growth.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.sampleforms.org/&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Forms&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;"&gt;www.sampleforms.org/.../a&amp;gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3517887" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Client Migration from Configuration Manager 2007 to Configuration Manager 2012</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/system_center_in_action/archive/2012/01/14/client-migration-blog.aspx#3515465</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2012 16:19:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3515465</guid><dc:creator>Catherine Campbell</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi, Ram - Naveen&amp;#39;s working on your request for post deployment configuration. Look for a post soon!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3515465" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Understanding Updates Management</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/system_center_in_action/archive/2011/05/02/test.aspx#3515461</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2012 16:08:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3515461</guid><dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;nice info&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3515461" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Client Migration from Configuration Manager 2007 to Configuration Manager 2012</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/system_center_in_action/archive/2012/01/14/client-migration-blog.aspx#3513506</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 20:48:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3513506</guid><dc:creator>Ram Neti</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Excellent information. Pl. share some insights experience and problem areas if any post configuration-- especially within the first 180 days of deployment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3513506" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Auditing Software Inventory Rules in System Center 2012 Configuration Manager</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/system_center_in_action/archive/2012/05/19/auditing-software-inventory-rules-in-system-center-2012-configuration-manager-versus-configuration-manager-2007.aspx#3507882</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 23:27:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3507882</guid><dc:creator>Benjamin Reynolds</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry Paul, was out on vacation...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The problem with a *.exe rule is that it is totally unnecessary and provides very little (if any) benefit.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;ve never seen a *.exe rule defined with a location other than &amp;quot;All client hard disks&amp;quot;. This means you&amp;#39;re performing a complete disk scan of all disks every time software inventory runs. It also means more network usage and larger database sizes (due to the amount of data collected, sent, and stored).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The reason this data provides little benefit is because hardware inventory is already collecting this information (most likely). If the application registers itself in Add/Remove Programs (ARP) hardware inventory is picking this information up already. If the application you want to report on doesn&amp;#39;t play nice and doesn&amp;#39;t register itself in ARP then you can turn on Asset Intelligence (AI) which will look in several sources (MSI, registry, and WMI) to compile the list of installed applications which is picked up by hardware inventory. If for some reason the application you want to report on isn&amp;#39;t listed in any of these locations then you can create a software inventory rule for that specific exe name and provide it a relative path (rather than running a complete disk scan). Does that help answer your question?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3507882" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>