<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Stefan Goßner - All Comments</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/stefan_gossner/</link><description>Senior Escalation Engineer for SharePoint (WSS, SPS, MOSS, SP2010) and MCMS</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: April 2013 CU for SharePoint 2010 has been released</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/stefan_gossner/archive/2013/04/10/april-2013-cu-for-sharepoint-2010-has-been-released.aspx#3573309</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 08:46:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3573309</guid><dc:creator>Stefan Goßner</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Etienne,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;sorry, I&amp;#39;m not aware of this issue. Haven&amp;#39;t found any references in current hotfix requests.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I would recommend to open a support case to get this analyzed and to ensure that you get a fix at earliest time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cheers,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Stefan&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3573309" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: April 2013 CU for SharePoint 2010 has been released</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/stefan_gossner/archive/2013/04/10/april-2013-cu-for-sharepoint-2010-has-been-released.aspx#3573283</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 06:43:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3573283</guid><dc:creator>Etienne MARIE</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello Stefan,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It seems there is a regression on the managed metadata service with the April 2013 CU:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.toddklindt.com/blog/Regressions/April2013CU.aspx"&gt;www.toddklindt.com/.../April2013CU.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Are you aware about any post CU hotfix for solving this / or workaround ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At a client we have install this CU on our DEV / INT environment and we are stuck with the testing because of this.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Many thanks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cheers,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Etienne.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3573283" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: April 2013 CU for SharePoint 2010 has been released</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/stefan_gossner/archive/2013/04/10/april-2013-cu-for-sharepoint-2010-has-been-released.aspx#3573238</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 21:54:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3573238</guid><dc:creator>Stefan Goßner</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Rob,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;March 2013 a PU has been released - no CU.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;October 2012 and later CUs already include the March 2013 PU. So it makes sense that it overwrites it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cheers,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Stefan&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3573238" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: April 2013 CU for SharePoint 2010 has been released</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/stefan_gossner/archive/2013/04/10/april-2013-cu-for-sharepoint-2010-has-been-released.aspx#3573231</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 20:58:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3573231</guid><dc:creator>Rob Palumbo</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Stefan,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am a big reader of your blogs. Thank you for posting!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I did have a question regarding the process of slipstreaming install media for SharePoint 2010 Server. It seems that there is an issue slipstreaming past Aug 2012 or higher CUs as they overwrite product updates for March 2012. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any suggestions on the proper way to slipstream a &amp;quot;gold&amp;quot; install media? Just to make things a little more complex we are running office web apps and project server. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you for your time&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3573231" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: MOSS - Common Issue - Incremental deployment fails with "The changeToken refers to a time before the start of the current change log."</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/stefan_gossner/archive/2008/03/13/moss-common-issue-incremental-deployment-fails-with-the-changetoken-refers-to-a-time-before-the-start-of-the-current-change-log.aspx#3572351</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 15:32:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3572351</guid><dc:creator>Stefan Goßner</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Shardul, &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;sounds like the following issue:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/stefan_gossner/archive/2010/12/29/interesting-changetoken-problem-when-mixing-complete-and-selective-deployment.aspx"&gt;blogs.technet.com/.../interesting-changetoken-problem-when-mixing-complete-and-selective-deployment.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cheers,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Stefan&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3572351" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Certain Microsoft SharePoint Server 2013 installation scenarios are not supported</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/stefan_gossner/archive/2012/10/29/certain-microsoft-sharepoint-server-2013-installation-scenarios-are-not-supported.aspx#3572299</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 11:34:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3572299</guid><dc:creator>Steven Andrews</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Stefan,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m asking this question with self-education in mind, not an operational situation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why is SP2013 not supported on a VM that utilizes dynamic memory?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Many thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Steven&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3572299" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: MOSS - Common Issue - Incremental deployment fails with "The changeToken refers to a time before the start of the current change log."</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/stefan_gossner/archive/2008/03/13/moss-common-issue-incremental-deployment-fails-with-the-changetoken-refers-to-a-time-before-the-start-of-the-current-change-log.aspx#3572242</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 04:51:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3572242</guid><dc:creator>shardul</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;hello, I am having site with many variation. for some variation we have created the incremental job which we have scheduled daily. Also we are modifying content regulary. still after change log period, all jobs got failed saying &amp;#39;change token error&amp;#39;. what may be reason for this? &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any help is appreaciated. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3572242" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: April 2013 CU for SharePoint 2013 has been released</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/stefan_gossner/archive/2013/04/27/april-2013-cu-for-sharepoint-2013-has-been-released.aspx#3570836</link><pubDate>Sun, 05 May 2013 21:31:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3570836</guid><dc:creator>Slow /extract</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Gerard,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;many people are experiencing verly slow /extract speeds with this CU (&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/sharepointadmin/thread/526b02a6-1c92-4871-a0a1-8b3a8bc98866"&gt;social.msdn.microsoft.com/.../526b02a6-1c92-4871-a0a1-8b3a8bc98866&lt;/a&gt;) are you seeing this?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Craig&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3570836" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: April 2013 CU for SharePoint 2013 has been released</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/stefan_gossner/archive/2013/04/27/april-2013-cu-for-sharepoint-2013-has-been-released.aspx#3570800</link><pubDate>Sun, 05 May 2013 08:47:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3570800</guid><dc:creator>Gerard</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The cab file is actually used by installing/extracing, it contains some msp files that are for some reason not in the exe file. However, you cannot slipstream this CU (or unlikely any CU until SP1) because of the dependency on the March Public Update. You need can put the PU in the Updates directory, but putting this CU there would overwrite msp files which the CU requires to be installed before in order to install. Also, extracting this update is very slow, can take from 1-2 hours..&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3570800" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: April 2013 CU for SharePoint 2010 has been released</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/stefan_gossner/archive/2013/04/10/april-2013-cu-for-sharepoint-2010-has-been-released.aspx#3570370</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 11:44:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3570370</guid><dc:creator>Stefan Goßner</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi SP, see here: &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://jaredmatfess.wordpress.com/2013/04/23/sharepoint-february-2013-cu-cod-breaks-the-rss-viewer-webpart/"&gt;jaredmatfess.wordpress.com/.../sharepoint-february-2013-cu-cod-breaks-the-rss-viewer-webpart&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3570370" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>