SQL Server Standard vs. Enterprise Edition

re: SQL Server Standard vs. Enterprise Edition

Craig — Tue, 12 Feb 2013 04:26:48 GMT

It's not mentioned anywhere, but you need the destination server to be Enterprise Edition for SSAS DB synchronisation.

re: SQL Server Standard vs. Enterprise Edition

Lucaseto — Mon, 03 Sep 2012 19:38:01 GMT

This link was removed, for those who still need this information can access this link I found

letrasandnumeros.com/.../sql-server-2008-enterprise-vs-standard-vs-workgroup-vs-web-vs-express

re: SQL Server Standard vs. Enterprise Edition

Question I have about standard memory — Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:29:52 GMT

If I have a system with 192 gb of ram with a system running standard. How come I see SQL use over 150gb? If it only support 64gb then why is it using more than that and what is it being used for?

re: SQL Server Standard vs. Enterprise Edition

Mark Smit — Tue, 25 Oct 2011 15:04:23 GMT

The fact that it costs 10x as much obviously doesn't factor in your considerations...

Remind me again, who do you work for?

re: SQL Server Standard vs. Enterprise Edition

Shashank Pawar — Tue, 29 Mar 2011 05:22:11 GMT

@rj What is the recommendation?

re: SQL Server Standard vs. Enterprise Edition

Roger Jennings — Sat, 26 Mar 2011 15:19:10 GMT

Re "Most of the time I end up recommending Enterprise Edition as it provides a platform that can grow with the solution."

Do you take license recommendation?

--rj