<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>EBD - Email &amp; Backup Dude</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/</link><description /><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>Exchange Content Index Rebuild</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2012/07/04/exchange-content-index-rebuild.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 16:29:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3507451</guid><dc:creator>BesirovicX</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=3507451</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2012/07/04/exchange-content-index-rebuild.aspx#comments</comments><description>One of the first actions most Exchange Administrators generally take when troubleshooting suspected problems with Exchange Content Indexing will be to rebuild the impacted Mailbox Database's content index files (either manually or by using the ResetSearchIndex...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2012/07/04/exchange-content-index-rebuild.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3507451" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/e2k7/">e2k7</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/exchange/">exchange</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/e2k10/">e2k10</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/exhange/">exhange</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/index/">index</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/content/">content</category></item><item><title>Remote Connectivity Analyser 1.4</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2012/07/04/remote-connectivity-analyser-1-4.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 16:07:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3507449</guid><dc:creator>BesirovicX</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=3507449</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2012/07/04/remote-connectivity-analyser-1-4.aspx#comments</comments><description>There are brilliant news for RCA users, owner team has made an awesome effort in listening to customers feedback and change quite a few issues or let’s just say a bit more annoying than what it should be operations! &amp;#160; Check it out below… For more...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2012/07/04/remote-connectivity-analyser-1-4.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3507449" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/e2k7/">e2k7</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/exchange/">exchange</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/e2k10/">e2k10</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/e2k3/">e2k3</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/e2k/">e2k</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/rca/">rca</category></item><item><title>Data Source Migration to Custom Volumes</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2012/05/07/data-source-migration-to-custom-volumes.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 19:46:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3496529</guid><dc:creator>BesirovicX</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=3496529</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2012/05/07/data-source-migration-to-custom-volumes.aspx#comments</comments><description>There may be scenarios where we would want to have some data sources’ data from DPM storage pool to some specific custom volumes. This post is here to show the main steps: Run the dpm2010-ldmstat.ps1 script to see which data sources have the most extents...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2012/05/07/data-source-migration-to-custom-volumes.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3496529" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/DPM2010/">DPM2010</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/DPM/">DPM</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/dpm2k10/">dpm2k10</category></item><item><title>Data Sources Dedicated Disk Volumes</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2012/05/07/data-sources-dedicated-disk-volumes.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 19:24:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3496524</guid><dc:creator>BesirovicX</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=3496524</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2012/05/07/data-sources-dedicated-disk-volumes.aspx#comments</comments><description>I think everyone understands that it’s not possible to select a specified disk from the DPM storage pool as a target disk for a specific protection group, however we can always move data between disks as far as the same DPM server has access to both disks...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2012/05/07/data-sources-dedicated-disk-volumes.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3496524" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/System+Center/">System Center</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/Protection/">Protection</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/DPM2010/">DPM2010</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/DPM/">DPM</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/dpm2k7/">dpm2k7</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/dpm2k10/">dpm2k10</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/backup/">backup</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/disk/">disk</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/volume/">volume</category></item><item><title>RBAC Manager (Exchange 2010 SP2)</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2012/05/07/rbac-manager-exchange-2010-sp2.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 18:41:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3496510</guid><dc:creator>BesirovicX</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=3496510</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2012/05/07/rbac-manager-exchange-2010-sp2.aspx#comments</comments><description>There is a quite awesome tool which will make Exchange administrators’ life so much easier when the need to play with Role Base Access Control comes… As everyone knows that’s an amazing feature on the Exchange Server however sometimes may get complex...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2012/05/07/rbac-manager-exchange-2010-sp2.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3496510" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/exchange/">exchange</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/e2k10/">e2k10</category></item><item><title>Tape Library Sharing I</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2011/11/17/tape-library-sharing-i.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 17:16:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3465899</guid><dc:creator>BesirovicX</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=3465899</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2011/11/17/tape-library-sharing-i.aspx#comments</comments><description>This post is supposed to be the first of a series of four and they all have a common goal which is to try to demystify the concept of Tape Library Sharing. I have to thanks to Michael Jacquet, who has been my main source either in forums, blogs, trainings...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2011/11/17/tape-library-sharing-i.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3465899" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/System+Center/">System Center</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/DPM2010/">DPM2010</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/DPM/">DPM</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/backup/">backup</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/sharing/">sharing</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/library/">library</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/tape/">tape</category></item><item><title>Exchange Server 2010 Design and Architecture</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/07/23/exchange-server-2010-design-and-architecture-microsoft-it.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 18:03:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3346345</guid><dc:creator>BesirovicX</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=3346345</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/07/23/exchange-server-2010-design-and-architecture-microsoft-it.aspx#comments</comments><description>Microsoft Information Technology (Microsoft IT) maintains a complex Microsoft® Exchange Server environment that consists of several geographic locations and multiple Active Directory® forests. There are 16 data centers, four of which host Exchange servers...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/07/23/exchange-server-2010-design-and-architecture-microsoft-it.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3346345" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/exchange/">exchange</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/e2k10/">e2k10</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/microsoft/">microsoft</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/design/">design</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/architecture/">architecture</category></item><item><title>Exchange Server 2010 UM Troubleshooting Tool</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/07/23/exchange-server-2010-unified-messaging-troubleshooting-beta.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 17:49:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3346343</guid><dc:creator>BesirovicX</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=3346343</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/07/23/exchange-server-2010-unified-messaging-troubleshooting-beta.aspx#comments</comments><description>I am pleased to announce that starting today you can download the BETA version of the Exchange UM 2010 troubleshooting tool from Microsoft Download Center . The Exchange Unified Messaging team needs your feedback! Download the tool, use it and let us...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/07/23/exchange-server-2010-unified-messaging-troubleshooting-beta.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3346343" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>DAGs Protection Hints – DPM 2010</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/07/22/dags-protection-hints-dpm-2010.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 15:20:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3345935</guid><dc:creator>BesirovicX</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=3345935</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/07/22/dags-protection-hints-dpm-2010.aspx#comments</comments><description>DPM 2010 provides node based protection so the state of the database on the node - whether it is an Active copy or a Passive copy of the Exchange 2010 DB does not matter. The state of the database may switch back and forth from Active to Passive, but...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/07/22/dags-protection-hints-dpm-2010.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3345935" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/exchange/">exchange</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/e2k10/">e2k10</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/Protection/">Protection</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/DPM/">DPM</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/dpm2k10/">dpm2k10</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/DAG/">DAG</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/backup/">backup</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/network/">network</category></item><item><title>OWA Coexistence With Legacy Versions</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/07/09/owa-coexistence-with-legacy-versions.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 16:15:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3343045</guid><dc:creator>BesirovicX</dc:creator><slash:comments>4</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=3343045</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/07/09/owa-coexistence-with-legacy-versions.aspx#comments</comments><description>In most environments that plan to implement Exchange 2010, there will probably be an older (legacy) version of Exchange Server running. This document provides information on how Exchange 2003, Exchange 2007, and Exchange 2010 will work together in regards...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/07/09/owa-coexistence-with-legacy-versions.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3343045" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/e2k7/">e2k7</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/exchange/">exchange</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/e2k10/">e2k10</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/cas/">cas</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/e2k3/">e2k3</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/upgrade/">upgrade</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/migration/">migration</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/legacy/">legacy</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/owa/">owa</category></item><item><title>Mailbox Quarantine</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/07/09/mailbox-quarantine.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 14:55:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3343029</guid><dc:creator>BesirovicX</dc:creator><slash:comments>6</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=3343029</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/07/09/mailbox-quarantine.aspx#comments</comments><description>One corrupted mailbox can have the potential to disrupt service by taking down the entire information store, thereby affecting all users on that server. Mailbox quarantine has been introduced in Exchange Server 2010 to help prevent this situation. What...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/07/09/mailbox-quarantine.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3343029" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/exchange/">exchange</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/e2k10/">e2k10</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/quarantine/">quarantine</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/mailbox/">mailbox</category></item><item><title>Database Availability Groups</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/07/02/database-availability-groups.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 22:41:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3341883</guid><dc:creator>BesirovicX</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=3341883</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/07/02/database-availability-groups.aspx#comments</comments><description>A database availability group (DAG) is a set of up to 16 Exchange Server 2010 Mailbox servers that provide automatic database-level recovery from a database, server, or network failure.&amp;#160; DAGs use continuous replication and a subset of Microsoft Windows...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/07/02/database-availability-groups.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3341883" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/exchange/">exchange</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/e2k10/">e2k10</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/cluster/">cluster</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/DAG/">DAG</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/high+availability/">high availability</category></item><item><title>DPM Licensing</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/06/23/dpm-licensing.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 16:22:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3340008</guid><dc:creator>BesirovicX</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=3340008</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/06/23/dpm-licensing.aspx#comments</comments><description>It was recently published an amazing article about DPM licensing… So many customers come to me asking me all of these questions regarding licensing, and because on my role we don’t deal with that we always end up kind of passing the question to other...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/06/23/dpm-licensing.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3340008" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/DPM/">DPM</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/dpm2k7/">dpm2k7</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/license/">license</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/licensing/">licensing</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/dpm2k10/">dpm2k10</category></item><item><title>Exchange Server 2007 Service Pack 3</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/06/23/exchange-server-2007-service-pack-3.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 23:11:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3339828</guid><dc:creator>BesirovicX</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=3339828</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/06/23/exchange-server-2007-service-pack-3.aspx#comments</comments><description>Another great achievement on the Exchange Universe… Exchange Server 2007 Service Pack 3!!!! I am very pleased to let you all know that Exchange Server 2007 SP3 is available for download. As we highlighted in Updates to the Exchange Supportability Matrix...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/06/23/exchange-server-2007-service-pack-3.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3339828" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/e2k7/">e2k7</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/exchange/">exchange</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/service+pack/">service pack</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/sp3/">sp3</category></item><item><title>Data Protection Manager 2007 Patches</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/05/13/data-protection-manager-2007-patches-service-packs-rollup-updates-hot-fixes.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 14:13:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3332412</guid><dc:creator>BesirovicX</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=3332412</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/05/13/data-protection-manager-2007-patches-service-packs-rollup-updates-hot-fixes.aspx#comments</comments><description>In conversation with a good friend, David Rankin, also known as The Highlander, and because I was in the middle of a Data Protection Manager 2007 Health Check and needed to check builds, versions, patches applied etc. he kindly help providing me his wonderful...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/05/13/data-protection-manager-2007-patches-service-packs-rollup-updates-hot-fixes.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3332412" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/DPM/">DPM</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/dpm2k7/">dpm2k7</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/hotfix/">hotfix</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/service+pack/">service pack</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/rollup/">rollup</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/patch/">patch</category></item><item><title>Renewing SSL Certificates on Exchange Server 2007</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/05/11/renewing-ssl-certificates-on-exchange-server-2007.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 10:22:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3331758</guid><dc:creator>BesirovicX</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=3331758</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/05/11/renewing-ssl-certificates-on-exchange-server-2007.aspx#comments</comments><description>SSL certificates are issued for periods of spanning a number of years (typically in multiples for example one, two or more years, however eventually they do expire and need to be renewed). The renewal process involves generating a fresh CSR (Certificate...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/05/11/renewing-ssl-certificates-on-exchange-server-2007.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3331758" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/e2k7/">e2k7</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/exchange/">exchange</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/cas/">cas</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/powershell/">powershell</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/ssl/">ssl</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/certificate/">certificate</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/w2k8/">w2k8</category></item><item><title>Exchange Server 2000/2003 to Exchange Server 2007: Large Mailboxes Migration/Consolidation</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/05/10/exchange-server-2000-2003-to-exchange-server-2007-large-mailboxes-migration-consolidation.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 17:21:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3331598</guid><dc:creator>BesirovicX</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=3331598</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/05/10/exchange-server-2000-2003-to-exchange-server-2007-large-mailboxes-migration-consolidation.aspx#comments</comments><description>This is a case study of a customer who wanted to perform a migration from Exchange Server 2000 / 2003 to Exchange Server 2007 whilst consolidating a number of remote sites to a centralised hub site. The main premise of this engagement was to ascertain...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/05/10/exchange-server-2000-2003-to-exchange-server-2007-large-mailboxes-migration-consolidation.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3331598" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/e2k7/">e2k7</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/exchange/">exchange</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/e2k3/">e2k3</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/ccr/">ccr</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/migration/">migration</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/large+mailboxes/">large mailboxes</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/e2k/">e2k</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/consolidation/">consolidation</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/SCR/">SCR</category></item><item><title>Exchange Server 2010 Certification Paths</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/05/08/exchange-server-2010-certification-paths.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 17:12:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3331302</guid><dc:creator>BesirovicX</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=3331302</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/05/08/exchange-server-2010-certification-paths.aspx#comments</comments><description>Overview Exchange Server 2010 help organizations guard their messaging with built-in protective technologies; offers anywhere access to email, voice mail, calendars, and contacts; and enables new levels of operational efficiency. Help develop your expertise...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/05/08/exchange-server-2010-certification-paths.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3331302" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/exchange/">exchange</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/e2k10/">e2k10</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/DPM/">DPM</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/dpm2k7/">dpm2k7</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/certification/">certification</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/exam/">exam</category></item><item><title>Exchange Server 2010 Deployment Assistant</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/05/08/exchange-server-2010-deployment-assistant.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 16:38:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3331301</guid><dc:creator>BesirovicX</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=3331301</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/05/08/exchange-server-2010-deployment-assistant.aspx#comments</comments><description>If you are concerned on knowing exactly what you need to do in order to migrate your current Exchange environment to Exchange Server 2010, whatever reason it is (multiple firewall rules, multiple certificates, multiple external URLs/ports for clients...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/05/08/exchange-server-2010-deployment-assistant.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3331301" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/e2k7/">e2k7</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/exchange/">exchange</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/e2k10/">e2k10</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/e2k3/">e2k3</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/migration/">migration</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/upgradede/">upgradede</category></item><item><title>Data Protection Manager and The Cloud</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/05/08/data-protection-manager-the-cloud.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 16:16:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3331300</guid><dc:creator>BesirovicX</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=3331300</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/05/08/data-protection-manager-the-cloud.aspx#comments</comments><description>There has been one too many conversations about Data Protection Manager and The Cloud… Some of them correct and others eventually a little bit less correct, so I decide to write this post in order to clear things a bit and hopefully help someone with...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/05/08/data-protection-manager-the-cloud.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3331300" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/DPM2010/">DPM2010</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/DPM/">DPM</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/i365/">i365</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/cloudrecovery/">cloudrecovery</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/cloud/">cloud</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/iron+mountain/">iron mountain</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/evault/">evault</category></item><item><title>Exchange Server 2010 and Lotus Notes: Quest Solution</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/05/06/exchange-server-2010-lotus-notes-quest-solution.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 20:45:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3330952</guid><dc:creator>BesirovicX</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=3330952</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/05/06/exchange-server-2010-lotus-notes-quest-solution.aspx#comments</comments><description>And finally it is out… The “kind of” expected element to allow Exchange Server 2010 (including BPOS) to coexist with Lotus Notes… The Quest Solution ! As you probably are aware already there is no support from Microsoft to make both environments to coexist...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/05/06/exchange-server-2010-lotus-notes-quest-solution.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3330952" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/exchange/">exchange</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/e2k10/">e2k10</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/notes/">notes</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/coexistence/">coexistence</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/lotus/">lotus</category></item><item><title>DPM 2010 Upgrade Advisor</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/05/05/dpm-2010-upgrade-advisor.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 21:21:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3330606</guid><dc:creator>BesirovicX</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=3330606</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/05/05/dpm-2010-upgrade-advisor.aspx#comments</comments><description>As we heard on the 19th of April we finally released DPM 2010 RTM, however customer wise it will only be available in June… For our customers which have already in place previous versions of DPM the main question will be how can they migrate their system...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/05/05/dpm-2010-upgrade-advisor.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3330606" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/DPM2010/">DPM2010</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/DPM/">DPM</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/dpm2k7/">dpm2k7</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/upgrade/">upgrade</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/migration/">migration</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/upgrade+advisor/">upgrade advisor</category></item><item><title>Multisite Exchange Organization Patching</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/05/05/multisite-exchange-organization-patching.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 21:00:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3330597</guid><dc:creator>BesirovicX</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=3330597</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/05/05/multisite-exchange-organization-patching.aspx#comments</comments><description>Imagine the following scenario where you have your Exchange Organization split in three major sites, where each site has their own domain, for instance EMEA, APAC and AMERICAS. In each site we have CCR clusters, Hub Transport and CAS servers, all in Service...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/05/05/multisite-exchange-organization-patching.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3330597" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/e2k7/">e2k7</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/exchange/">exchange</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/e2k10/">e2k10</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/cas/">cas</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/upgrade/">upgrade</category></item><item><title>Hyper-V Best Practices Analyzer</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/05/05/hyper-v-best-practices-analyzer.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 12:08:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3330380</guid><dc:creator>BesirovicX</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=3330380</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/05/05/hyper-v-best-practices-analyzer.aspx#comments</comments><description>Best Practices Analyzer (BPA) is a server management tool that is available in Windows Server 2008 R2. BPA reports best practice violations to the administrator after BPA scans the roles that are installed on Windows Server 2008 R2. Administrators can...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/05/05/hyper-v-best-practices-analyzer.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3330380" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/best+practices/">best practices</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/BPA/">BPA</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/Hyper_2D00_V/">Hyper-V</category></item><item><title>PowerShell Execution Policy Granularity</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/05/04/powershell-execution-policy-granularity.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 17:06:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3330192</guid><dc:creator>BesirovicX</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=3330192</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/05/04/powershell-execution-policy-granularity.aspx#comments</comments><description>Imagine the scenario where you want to to set an execution policy for a specific user on a machine. The per-user setting is nothing more than a key in the registry, something like: [HKEY_USERS\S-1-5-21-REST-OF-SID\Software\Microsoft\PowerShell\1\ShellIds...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/2010/05/04/powershell-execution-policy-granularity.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3330192" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/granularity/">granularity</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/execution+policy/">execution policy</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sjimmie/archive/tags/powershell/">powershell</category></item></channel></rss>