<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Shawn Gibbs on Application Management - All Comments</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/shawngibbs/</link><description>You can’t manage what you don’t monitor. Application Performance Management with AVIcode and System Center.</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Application Dependencies and Chained Events</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/shawngibbs/archive/2012/04/04/application-dependencies-and-chained-events.aspx#3531096</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 14:43:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3531096</guid><dc:creator>Shawn Gibbs [MSFT]</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Keep in mind chained events are based on several things. First is that you capture events from all systems in the chain. Second that they have specific calling functions and answering functions, for example a client service model invoke talks to a wcf service with a server service model invoke. So for failures the exceptions needs to be in the caller and in the callee. Timings are also matched but I suspect the problem is one is handled and rethrown which places the exception in a part of the stack that doesn&amp;#39;t appear to be a client or server.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3531096" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Application Dependencies and Chained Events</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/shawngibbs/archive/2012/04/04/application-dependencies-and-chained-events.aspx#3531092</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 14:22:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3531092</guid><dc:creator>deniz</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello Shawn, &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I just found your blog post while searching for a specific trouble &amp;nbsp;that we are experiencing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any opinions why I can never have chained &amp;quot;Exception&amp;quot; events, while having many chained &amp;quot;Performance&amp;quot; events?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I mean when I click the &amp;quot;Distributed Chains&amp;quot; tab for an Exception Event (when the chained exception events are grossly obvious and observable by inspection) APM cannot &amp;nbsp;seem to relate &amp;amp; &amp;nbsp;chain them .&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I suspect it is some incorrect setting or missing configuration on our account.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3531092" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: System Center .NET Application Alerts vs Events</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/shawngibbs/archive/2012/04/13/system-center-net-application-alerts-vs-events.aspx#3509035</link><pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2012 18:57:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3509035</guid><dc:creator>Daniele Muscetta</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I had another post on a similar topic (more on the &amp;quot;behind the scenes&amp;quot; of SCOM workflows in this regard than on the process, to be honest) which probably complements this one of yours - &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/momteam/archive/2012/01/23/custom-apm-rules-for-granular-alerting.aspx"&gt;blogs.technet.com/.../custom-apm-rules-for-granular-alerting.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3509035" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>