<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>SQL Server 2005 - 1 Year And Not Yet Counting...</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/security/archive/2006/11/07/sql-server-2005-1-year-and-not-yet-counting.aspx</link><description>Vulnerabilities, that is. It has been about a year now since SQL Server 2005, so I thought this would be a good time to review how it has done security-wise. The latest SQL Server product from Microsoft has had zero vulnerabilities disclosed or fixed</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>SQL Server 2005 using Cryptography &amp; Encryption what they are for?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/security/archive/2006/11/07/sql-server-2005-1-year-and-not-yet-counting.aspx#1949615</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 16:45:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:1949615</guid><dc:creator>SQL Server Security, Performance &amp; Tuning (SSQA.net)</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Since the inception of SQL Server 2005 data encryption and cryptography functionality has elevated to&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1949615" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Un blog très intéressant sur la sécurité en général...</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/security/archive/2006/11/07/sql-server-2005-1-year-and-not-yet-counting.aspx#708226</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 14:14:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:708226</guid><dc:creator>SQL Server, BizTalk Server, le 64 bits et au-delà !...</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blogs.technet.com/security/"&gt;http://blogs.technet.com/security/&lt;/a&gt; et notamment celle des bases de donn&amp;#233;es ! Les derniers chiffres sont&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=708226" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Microsoft SQL vs Oracle : David Litchfield Comparison Paper</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/security/archive/2006/11/07/sql-server-2005-1-year-and-not-yet-counting.aspx#532506</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 21:17:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:532506</guid><dc:creator>Jeff Jones Security Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;From what most will consider a more authoritative source than me, David Litchfield, a new paper addresses&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=532506" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Litchfield: Comparado con Oracle, Microsoft SQL Server es m&amp;#225;s seguro</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/security/archive/2006/11/07/sql-server-2005-1-year-and-not-yet-counting.aspx#528424</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 08:27:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:528424</guid><dc:creator>PERCY REYES'S BLOG™ : Evolucionando</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;David Litchfield , reputado investigador de seguridad (especializado en bases de datos) demuestra, aportando&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=528424" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Litchfield: Comparado con Oracle, Microsoft SQL Server es m&amp;#225;s seguro</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/security/archive/2006/11/07/sql-server-2005-1-year-and-not-yet-counting.aspx#528423</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 08:27:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:528423</guid><dc:creator>Percy Reyes's Blog™ -&gt; Evolucionando</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;David Litchfield, reputado investigador de seguridad (especializado en bases de datos) demuestra, aportando...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=528423" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Enterprise Strategy Group on SQL 2005: &amp;quot;Microsoft Years Ahead...&amp;quot;</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/security/archive/2006/11/07/sql-server-2005-1-year-and-not-yet-counting.aspx#515284</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 02:39:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:515284</guid><dc:creator>Jeff Jones Security Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;With a year's track-record, SQL Server 2005's positive security performance is being noticed beyond just&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=515284" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: SQL Server 2005 - 1 Year And Not Yet Counting...</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/security/archive/2006/11/07/sql-server-2005-1-year-and-not-yet-counting.aspx#510275</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 10:25:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:510275</guid><dc:creator>noocyte</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;We're using both SQL Server 2000/2005 and Oracle 9i/10g, and I must say SQL Server 2005 is a HUGE improvement over 2000. We've yet to run into a single bug. Not one. Ever. Incredible!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With Oracle we run into bugs every 2-3 months... &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=510275" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Another link on the topic</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/security/archive/2006/11/07/sql-server-2005-1-year-and-not-yet-counting.aspx#506884</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 22:45:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:506884</guid><dc:creator>TJEdward</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Also check out Eric Lippert's blog. &amp;nbsp;He had an article recently about mitigating SQL injection in your apps. &amp;nbsp;The article is here: &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ericlippert/archive/2006/11/01/how-do-i-mitigate-a-sql-injection-vuln.aspx"&gt;http://blogs.msdn.com/ericlippert/archive/2006/11/01/how-do-i-mitigate-a-sql-injection-vuln.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As solid as your base is, an application's security is only as good as its weakest link. &amp;nbsp;Make sure that weak point isn't your developers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=506884" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>