<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Workload Vulnerability Index</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/security/archive/2006/05/09/427849.aspx</link><description>In the recent Risk Report: A Year of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 in Red Hat Magazine, Mark Cox defined an interesting new security metric, the Workload Vulnerability Index, that provides a weighted measure of the impact that ongoing security vulnerabilities</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>?ffentlicher Exchange-Server | hilpers</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/security/archive/2006/05/09/427849.aspx#3186846</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:03:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3186846</guid><dc:creator>?ffentlicher Exchange-Server | hilpers</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.hilpers.com/412823-offentlicher-exchange-server"&gt;http://www.hilpers.com/412823-offentlicher-exchange-server&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3186846" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Securitate - Workload Vulnerability Index</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/security/archive/2006/05/09/427849.aspx#632199</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 16:35:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:632199</guid><dc:creator>Weblogul lui Zoli</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Mark Cox, in incercarea sa disperata de a minimaliza numarul mare de vulnerabilitati din RHEL4, a inventat&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=632199" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Trend Micro CTO hints that Trend will Open Source Code</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/security/archive/2006/05/09/427849.aspx#435961</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 01:26:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:435961</guid><dc:creator>Think Security - Jeff Jones Security Blog </dc:creator><description>In a stunning revelation in Trend Micro: Open source is more secure, Trend CTO Raimund Genes&amp;amp;amp;nbsp;hints...&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=435961" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Is Security your thing? Ever wonder about Windows Vs. Linux security and marketing FUD?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/security/archive/2006/05/09/427849.aspx#435592</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 16:40:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:435592</guid><dc:creator>Canadian IT Professionals</dc:creator><description>I just got through reading a bunch of posts on one of my new favourite blog sites &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blogs.technet.com/security/&amp;amp;amp;nbsp;which"&gt;http://blogs.technet.com/security/&amp;amp;amp;nbsp;which&lt;/a&gt;...&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=435592" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Artima: Microsoft Under Attack</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/security/archive/2006/05/09/427849.aspx#432820</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 03:52:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:432820</guid><dc:creator>Think Security - Jeff Jones Security Blog </dc:creator><description>A new article called Microsoft Under Attack summarizes itself by saying: &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not by angry customers suing...&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=432820" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>The illusion of invulnerability (Linux)</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/security/archive/2006/05/09/427849.aspx#427896</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 14:25:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:427896</guid><dc:creator>Spyware Sucks</dc:creator><description>There is an excellent, albeit short, article about security for Linux users that is worth a quick read:&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.viruslist.com/en/weblog?weblogid=186275723"&gt;http://www.viruslist.com/en/weblog?weblogid=186275723&lt;/a&gt;...&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=427896" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Securitate - Workload Vulnerability Index</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/security/archive/2006/05/09/427849.aspx#427888</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 13:23:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:427888</guid><dc:creator>Weblogul lui Zoli</dc:creator><description>Mark Cox, in incercarea sa disperata de a minimaliza numarul mare de vulnerabilitati din RHEL4, a inventat...&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=427888" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Workload Vulnerability Index</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/security/archive/2006/05/09/427849.aspx#427853</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 02:44:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:427853</guid><dc:creator>Alun Jones</dc:creator><description>You must be using a metric deliberately chosen to show your competitors in a poor light.&lt;br&gt;Oh.&lt;br&gt;:-)&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=427853" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>