<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search Guys - All Comments</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/searchguys/</link><description>Everything search, including product commentary and guidance, search strategies and general technical guidance</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: SharePoint 2013 and Search Service PerformanceLevel</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/searchguys/archive/2013/02/24/sharepoint-2013-and-search-service-performancelevel.aspx#3563577</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 18:59:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3563577</guid><dc:creator>Matt King - Search</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting... in SharePoint 2013, the PerformanceLevel only applies to the Crawler component and it is doing significantly less than it was in 2010.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3563577" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Mucking with search summaries in SP2013</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/searchguys/archive/2013/04/03/mucking-with-search-summaries-in-sp2013.aspx#3563402</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 07:55:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3563402</guid><dc:creator>Murad</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;BTW, the ctx.RenderBody(ctx) is inserting the content of the Item_CommonItem_Body.html.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you need to customize that, simply copy the contents of Item_CommonItem_Body into your template and replace it with the ctx.RenderBody(ctx).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3563402" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: SharePoint 2013 and Search Service PerformanceLevel</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/searchguys/archive/2013/02/24/sharepoint-2013-and-search-service-performancelevel.aspx#3561659</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 20:59:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3561659</guid><dc:creator>Remco de Groot</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I do not agree. I&amp;#39;ve set the level to Reduced and I see a big difference in CPU utilization (and crawl time of course).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3561659" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: BCS and FAST: Introduction and first steps</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/searchguys/archive/2012/06/01/bcs-and-fast-introduction.aspx#3559812</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 07:11:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3559812</guid><dc:creator>Pradeep</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Ansiya,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You can create a scope rule and exclude the mentioned results.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3559812" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: BCS and FAST: Introduction and first steps</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/searchguys/archive/2012/06/01/bcs-and-fast-introduction.aspx#3558956</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 16:11:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3558956</guid><dc:creator>Ansiya</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As mentioned in the article, two additional records are shown up in the search results which are generated for each method call. Can you please explain how to exclude these useless urls? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks in advance! &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3558956" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Getting Refiner Counts Back in SharePoint 2013 Search</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/searchguys/archive/2012/08/16/getting-refiner-counts-back-in-sharepoint-2013-search.aspx#3551808</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 22:58:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3551808</guid><dc:creator>Bibhu Lenka</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Good to know that its so easy to change. Hope you are doing good.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3551808" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: BCS and FAST: Introduction and first steps</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/searchguys/archive/2012/06/01/bcs-and-fast-introduction.aspx#3512887</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 06:38:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3512887</guid><dc:creator>pedro</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m currently trying to build a solution that supports &amp;quot;Scaling full crawls by using batched requests&amp;quot;, but i&amp;#39;m having some probelms, do you have any information on this ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3512887" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Smoke testing a FAST for SharePoint install</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/searchguys/archive/2012/06/04/smoke-testing-a-fast-for-sharepoint-install.aspx#3502012</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 23:04:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3502012</guid><dc:creator>Ashish Mahajan Australia (Architect)</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Informative article.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3502012" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>