<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Exchange 2007 - Continuous Replication Architecture and Behavior</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/scottschnoll/archive/2006/10/06/exchange-2007-_2D00_-continuous-replication-architecture-and-behavior.aspx</link><description>I've previously blogged about the two forms of continuous replication that are built into Exchange 2007: Local Continuous Replication (LCR) and Cluster Continuous Replication (CCR). In those blogcasts, you can see replication at work, but we really don</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Exchange 2007 - Continuous Replication Architecture and Behavior</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/scottschnoll/archive/2006/10/06/exchange-2007-_2D00_-continuous-replication-architecture-and-behavior.aspx#640019</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:30:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:640019</guid><dc:creator>Peter Zdovc</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Scott, this is very valuable information. I have two more questions though.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. In some scenarios it is proposed that backup of exchange database should run on passive node. If we failover to this node and log replication changes direction, how is exchange backup API going to handle logs that haven't been replicated (for example we stop exchange replication service to do some maintenance). Is there any fear that backup is going to purge logs that haven't been replicated?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. What services are to be stopped for performing maintenance jobs on passive node (for example installing patches).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=640019" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>More on Continuous Replication</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/scottschnoll/archive/2006/10/06/exchange-2007-_2D00_-continuous-replication-architecture-and-behavior.aspx#491146</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 20:38:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:491146</guid><dc:creator>Is this thing on?</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;In my last blog entry , I talked about the internals of the continuous replication feature in Exchange&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=491146" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Weekend reading</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/scottschnoll/archive/2006/10/06/exchange-2007-_2D00_-continuous-replication-architecture-and-behavior.aspx#483417</link><pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 14:57:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:483417</guid><dc:creator>subject: exchange</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Going Live with Exchange 2007, Part 1 Integrate SharePoint into Your Exchange Environment Exchange 2007&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=483417" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>