http://blogs.technet.com/b/scottschnoll/Scott Schnoll&#39;s weblogen-USTelligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)http://blogs.technet.com/b/scottschnoll/archive/2013/04/02/high-availability-changes-in-exchange-server-2013-cumulative-update-1.aspx#3567037Tue, 16 Apr 2013 13:37:15 GMTd5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3567037Buenoflex<p>thank a lot Scott. More update in this CU1 on CAS ?</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3567037" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.technet.com/b/scottschnoll/archive/2013/04/02/high-availability-changes-in-exchange-server-2013-cumulative-update-1.aspx#3563515Thu, 04 Apr 2013 15:54:42 GMTd5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3563515ff<p>The Edge Transport server is not currently available in Microsoft Exchange Server 2013.</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3563515" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.technet.com/b/scottschnoll/archive/2013/04/02/high-availability-changes-in-exchange-server-2013-cumulative-update-1.aspx#3563136Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:20:30 GMTd5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3563136Edge Transport<p>Any update on an Edge Transport server for Exchange 2013?</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3563136" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.technet.com/b/scottschnoll/archive/2013/04/02/high-availability-changes-in-exchange-server-2013-cumulative-update-1.aspx#3562935Wed, 03 Apr 2013 02:15:33 GMTd5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3562935SeanCa<p>Thanks Scott, your blog updates help make these updates and their impacts more understandable!</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3562935" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.technet.com/b/scottschnoll/archive/2013/04/02/high-availability-changes-in-exchange-server-2013-cumulative-update-1.aspx#3562788Tue, 02 Apr 2013 18:03:57 GMTd5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3562788DavidJCarr<p>Great Changes Scott. Thank you for the update.</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3562788" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.technet.com/b/scottschnoll/archive/2012/11/01/storage-high-availability-and-site-resilience-in-exchange-server-2013-part-3.aspx#3530194Fri, 02 Nov 2012 00:33:46 GMTd5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3530194vlalonso<p>Awesome ! Thanks, Scott.</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3530194" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.technet.com/b/scottschnoll/archive/2012/11/01/storage-high-availability-and-site-resilience-in-exchange-server-2013-part-3.aspx#3530188Thu, 01 Nov 2012 23:30:03 GMTd5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3530188Serhad MAKBULOĞLU<p>beautiful series</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3530188" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.technet.com/b/scottschnoll/archive/2012/11/01/storage-high-availability-and-site-resilience-in-exchange-server-2013-part-3.aspx#3530132Thu, 01 Nov 2012 19:49:32 GMTd5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3530132Hakim Taoussi<p>Great post! Well explained</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3530132" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.technet.com/b/scottschnoll/archive/2012/09/19/storage-high-availability-and-site-resilience-in-exchange-server-2013-part-1.aspx#3523800Tue, 02 Oct 2012 16:32:52 GMTd5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3523800Ian<p>I have a question about the passive copy IO in Exchange 2010. Early in the blog you state that the disk IOPs for the passive copy were underutilized but later state that the IOPS for a passive copy was equal to the IOPs for a active copy in exchange 2010. How are the disks underutilized in terms of IOPS between the active and passive copies if the IOPS is the same? Am I misunderstanding something? </p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3523800" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.technet.com/b/scottschnoll/archive/2012/10/01/storage-high-availability-and-site-resilience-in-exchange-server-2013-part-2.aspx#3523702Tue, 02 Oct 2012 08:00:51 GMTd5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3523702Wise Tsang<p>I feel Exchange 2013 changed only a little。</p> <p>So！what do you think？</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3523702" width="1" height="1">