<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Common Networking Issues After Applying Windows Server 2003 SP2 on SBS</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sbs/archive/2007/04/24/common-networking-issues-after-applying-windows-server-2003-sp2-on-sbs.aspx</link><description>[Today's post comes to us courtesy of Mark Stanfill] 
 Overview 
 We have seen an increasing number of support calls from customers experiencing a variety of networking-related issues after installing Windows Server 2003 SP2 . We have previously covered</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>Improving performance for stsadm -o export and import</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sbs/archive/2007/04/24/common-networking-issues-after-applying-windows-server-2003-sp2-on-sbs.aspx#3036747</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:20:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3036747</guid><dc:creator>the road into a managed world</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Last week we've migrated content from one farm to another using stsadm –o export / import. The export&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3036747" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>SBS SP1? Are you saying Windows Server 2003 SP1?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sbs/archive/2007/04/24/common-networking-issues-after-applying-windows-server-2003-sp2-on-sbs.aspx#2152426</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:14:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2152426</guid><dc:creator>Girish's Graffiti</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Ok so I am going to try and make this as simple as possible. SBS SP1 is not the same as Windows Server&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2152426" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Known things to read before deploying SP2</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sbs/archive/2007/04/24/common-networking-issues-after-applying-windows-server-2003-sp2-on-sbs.aspx#2145880</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 10:16:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2145880</guid><dc:creator>MVPs</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blogs.technet.com/sbs/archive/2007/04/24/common-networking-issues-after-applying-windows-server"&gt;http://blogs.technet.com/sbs/archive/2007/04/24/common-networking-issues-after-applying-windows-server&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2145880" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Known things to read before deploying SP2</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sbs/archive/2007/04/24/common-networking-issues-after-applying-windows-server-2003-sp2-on-sbs.aspx#2145850</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 09:58:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2145850</guid><dc:creator>E-Bitz - SBS MVP the Official Blog of the SBS "Diva"</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blogs.technet.com/sbs/archive/2007/04/24/common-networking-issues-after-applying-windows-server"&gt;http://blogs.technet.com/sbs/archive/2007/04/24/common-networking-issues-after-applying-windows-server&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2145850" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Confidence</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sbs/archive/2007/04/24/common-networking-issues-after-applying-windows-server-2003-sp2-on-sbs.aspx#1312386</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 10:48:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:1312386</guid><dc:creator>E-Bitz - SBS MVP the Official Blog of the SBS "Diva"</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;So tonight I was taking some vmwares of SBS&amp;amp;#39;s and I had already played a bit with Acronis and Paragon&amp;amp;#39;s&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1312386" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Two important SBS2003 Updates released to Microsoft Update</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sbs/archive/2007/04/24/common-networking-issues-after-applying-windows-server-2003-sp2-on-sbs.aspx#1215097</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 11:40:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:1215097</guid><dc:creator>Nick Whittome - "The Naked MVP" </dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;From the Official SBS Blog 1) &amp;amp;ldquo;Critical Update for Windows Small Business Server 2003: Vista and&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1215097" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>SP2 RSS/Checksum/TCP fix up now on Microsoft update</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sbs/archive/2007/04/24/common-networking-issues-after-applying-windows-server-2003-sp2-on-sbs.aspx#1185921</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 22:47:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:1185921</guid><dc:creator>E-Bitz - SBS MVP the Official Blog of the SBS "Diva"</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The Official SBS Blog : New SBS 2003 Updates released through Microsoft Update and WSUS: &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blogs"&gt;http://blogs&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1185921" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>New SBS 2003 Updates released through Microsoft Update and WSUS</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sbs/archive/2007/04/24/common-networking-issues-after-applying-windows-server-2003-sp2-on-sbs.aspx#1185787</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 22:27:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:1185787</guid><dc:creator>The Official SBS Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;[Today's post comes to us courtesy of Duncan Chalmers and Damian Leibaschoff] Today the SBS SE team released&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1185787" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Windows Server 2003 SP2 Will Hit Automatic Updates Next Week</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sbs/archive/2007/04/24/common-networking-issues-after-applying-windows-server-2003-sp2-on-sbs.aspx#1165540</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 00:11:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:1165540</guid><dc:creator>The Official SBS Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;[Today's post comes to us courtesy of Mark Stanfill] Windows Server 2003 SP2 will be released to Automatic&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1165540" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Before you install</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sbs/archive/2007/04/24/common-networking-issues-after-applying-windows-server-2003-sp2-on-sbs.aspx#1122925</link><pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 05:20:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:1122925</guid><dc:creator>E-Bitz - SBS MVP the Official Blog of the SBS "Diva"</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;If the readme for SP2 was written like it should be it would be like this: Before you install Before&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1122925" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>