<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>SBS 2008: Supported Networking Topology</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sbs/archive/2008/09/16/sbs-2008-supported-networking-topology.aspx</link><description>[Today's post comes to us courtesy of Justin Crosby and Wayne McIntyre] 
 Networking in SBS 2008 has been simplified down to one supported network topology. Today’s post will discuss this topology. 
 SBS 2008 is designed to be installed with a single</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: SBS 2008: Supported Networking Topology</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sbs/archive/2008/09/16/sbs-2008-supported-networking-topology.aspx#3134713</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 23:14:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3134713</guid><dc:creator>Ben Waldon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;It is my understanding that there is a method of adding a second NIC for iSCSI purposes. But, you have to dedicate it to iSCSI, so that the Operating system doesn't identify it as a network adapter.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How that is possible (because the iSCSI relies on IP) and what that procedure is is something that I am trying to figure out.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3134713" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>ISCSI to SAN</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sbs/archive/2008/09/16/sbs-2008-supported-networking-topology.aspx#3130401</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 01:50:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3130401</guid><dc:creator>SLC</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Are you saying that it is not possible in SBS 2008 to use a separate virtual network adaptor i.e. for for making ISCSI connection to my SAN where usually we keep the data....?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3130401" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>BlogMS Weekly Articles Published - 15th September 2008 to 21st September 2008</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sbs/archive/2008/09/16/sbs-2008-supported-networking-topology.aspx#3126953</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 22:29:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3126953</guid><dc:creator>BlogMS - Official Microsoft Team Blogs</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;189 Microsoft Team blogs searched, 91 blogs have new articles in the past 7 days. 214 new articles found&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3126953" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: SBS 2008: Supported Networking Topology</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sbs/archive/2008/09/16/sbs-2008-supported-networking-topology.aspx#3125357</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 22:15:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3125357</guid><dc:creator>SBS Bloggers</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Teneo/Bill&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In this diagram your WAN is seperated from your LAN with a hardware firewall. &amp;nbsp;Since SBS 2008 no longer acts as a routing firewall you should use a hardware firewall or install a second server with 2 NICs and a software firewall to protect your LAN. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3125357" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: SBS 2008: Supported Networking Topology</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sbs/archive/2008/09/16/sbs-2008-supported-networking-topology.aspx#3125269</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 19:08:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3125269</guid><dc:creator>Sean Daniel</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;NIC Teaming is allowed, although you'll have to set up your team after you run wizards like Connect to the Internet Wizard, or Fix My Network wizard. &amp;nbsp;As both of these wizards will disable (and break) the team. &amp;nbsp;Also, if you call for networking support, you may be required to break the team, and go back to a single-NIC to get the support you need.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All in all, this change allows you to choose your network firewall, this can be the hardware or software firewall of your choice!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3125269" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: SBS 2008: Supported Networking Topology</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sbs/archive/2008/09/16/sbs-2008-supported-networking-topology.aspx#3125113</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 11:47:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3125113</guid><dc:creator>Teneo / Bill</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Surely this example is not a recommendation. Having server / clients / lan and WAN on same network. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Security... seperate LAN from WAN !!! THis was the whole point with 2 NICs. Now clients have to implement this very MUCH unsecure config OR buy additional equipment to seperate WAN... just like being in the enterprise environment which defeats the SBS concept&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3125113" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: SBS 2008: Supported Networking Topology</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sbs/archive/2008/09/16/sbs-2008-supported-networking-topology.aspx#3125041</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 08:23:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3125041</guid><dc:creator>lukasbeeler</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;What about NIC Teaming?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is this unsupported with SBS2008?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3125041" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: SBS 2008: Supported Networking Topology</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sbs/archive/2008/09/16/sbs-2008-supported-networking-topology.aspx#3125034</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 08:00:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3125034</guid><dc:creator>Ben Hamilton</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;With SBS 2008 only using a single NIC with a single IP Address, does it matter any if that 'single NIC' is in fact a Dual GB NIC with both adaptors 'TEAM'ed to give a single 2GB link to the switch, with just one IP address?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3125034" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: SBS 2008: Supported Networking Topology</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sbs/archive/2008/09/16/sbs-2008-supported-networking-topology.aspx#3124939</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 01:05:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3124939</guid><dc:creator>nathan</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Good info guys . . . what about teaming/joining - I have an SBS 2003 box that has four nics &amp;quot;teamed&amp;quot; together as one logical NIC. For apps like Dynamics/Great Plains, a single giga-bit connection is &amp;nbsp;a bit low. (And yes, I know that's quite a load for the server to put an app like that on top of SBS, but some small shops can't afford a second server.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3124939" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>