<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>SBS 2008 and Virtualization</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sbs/archive/2008/09/15/sbs-2008-and-virtualization.aspx</link><description>Possibly one of the most exciting topics in the market today &amp;#8211; well perhaps not as exciting as SBS, but close! Earlier this week we ran a special session for our partners covering the intended support details for running Windows Small Business Server</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>Virtualizing Microsoft Small Business Server 2008</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sbs/archive/2008/09/15/sbs-2008-and-virtualization.aspx#3206576</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:39:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3206576</guid><dc:creator>BVA</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;amp;#160; With the release of Small Business Server 2008, based on Server 2008 Standard edition, as well&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3206576" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>SBS 2008 on Hyper-V</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sbs/archive/2008/09/15/sbs-2008-and-virtualization.aspx#3130986</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 23:55:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3130986</guid><dc:creator>Joe Raby</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;If the main SBS 2008 server is run from within Hyper-V (either Server 2008 or Hyper-V Server), is it recommended to keep the parent partition out of the domain to keep from using up a CAL on SBS?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It would seem that the best option to manage Hyper-V remotely would be to do so also on a computer that isn't connected to the same domain that the SBS DC controls. &amp;nbsp;Is that correct?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Installing SBS in a VM on Hyper-V doesn't seem to be a good option since there is no local GUI in Hyper-V with which to access the VM for initial setup. &amp;nbsp;Is it therefore recommended to use an unattended installation of SBS that enables Remote Desktop and other first-boot options? &amp;nbsp;I get that there's no local GUI administration of Hyper-V Server, but there should be some kind of &amp;quot;software KVM&amp;quot; to see the VM's from a local console, rather than relying on having Remote Desktop enabled from the get-go. &amp;nbsp;If there is already an option like this, how do you get to it?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3130986" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>BlogMS Weekly Articles Published - 15th September 2008 to 21st September 2008</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sbs/archive/2008/09/15/sbs-2008-and-virtualization.aspx#3126952</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 22:29:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3126952</guid><dc:creator>BlogMS - Official Microsoft Team Blogs</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;189 Microsoft Team blogs searched, 91 blogs have new articles in the past 7 days. 214 new articles found&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3126952" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Small Business Server 2008 and Virtualization</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sbs/archive/2008/09/15/sbs-2008-and-virtualization.aspx#3125774</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 18:57:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3125774</guid><dc:creator>UK SBSC</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Earlier this week the Windows Essential Server Solutions team in Redmond released the official Small&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3125774" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: SBS 2008 and Virtualization</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sbs/archive/2008/09/15/sbs-2008-and-virtualization.aspx#3125095</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 11:02:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3125095</guid><dc:creator>Klaus Jakobsen</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for sharing this.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Btw, this homepage could use a print-function with a printer-friendly layout...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3125095" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: SBS 2008 and Virtualization</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sbs/archive/2008/09/15/sbs-2008-and-virtualization.aspx#3124986</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 04:12:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3124986</guid><dc:creator>Boon Tee</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;What about a scenario where the SBS2008 1st server becomes the HyperV host, and we virtualise the 2nd server?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This would enable fax services, USB backups to operate normally, while utilising the 2nd server virtually to run lower load environments.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3124986" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Virtualisation for SBS 2008 &amp; EBS 2008 - the official story</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sbs/archive/2008/09/15/sbs-2008-and-virtualization.aspx#3124949</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 01:27:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3124949</guid><dc:creator>SBS Down Under</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The Windows Essential Server Solutions team in Redmond have released the official SBS &amp;amp;amp; EBS virtualisation&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3124949" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: SBS 2008 and Virtualization</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sbs/archive/2008/09/15/sbs-2008-and-virtualization.aspx#3124506</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 01:26:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3124506</guid><dc:creator>kevinrjames</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Shouldn't the graphic in the scenerio one say &amp;quot;SBS Standard server&amp;quot; not &amp;quot;SBS Premium - 1st server&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;/kj&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3124506" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>SBS &amp; EBS blog posts on Supported Virtualization Scenarios</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/sbs/archive/2008/09/15/sbs-2008-and-virtualization.aspx#3124455</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 23:45:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3124455</guid><dc:creator>Nicholas King</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Today and Yesterday we posted respective blogs on the support scenarios for SBS and EBS.&amp;amp;#160; As you&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3124455" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>