<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Virtualization, the SAN and why one big RAID 5 array is wrong.</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/rycampbe/archive/2011/08/23/virtualization-the-san-and-why-one-big-raid-5-array-is-wrong.aspx</link><description>Today I've had no less than 3 ad hoc conversations about disk sharing for VMs. This isn't about RAID5 versus RAID10, specific performance requirements for SharePoint, or cache for simultaneous read/write requests. This is simply aimed at giving SharePoint</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Virtualization, the SAN and why one big RAID 5 array is wrong.</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/rycampbe/archive/2011/08/23/virtualization-the-san-and-why-one-big-raid-5-array-is-wrong.aspx#3448676</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 17:22:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3448676</guid><dc:creator>Nancy Johnson</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m going to pass this on to my friend who configures and administers Sharepoint 2010. &amp;nbsp;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3448676" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>