<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>IE and Firefox vulnerabilities</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/rhalbheer/archive/2007/11/30/ie-and-firefox-vulnerabilities.aspx</link><description>I am still convinced that there is limited value in comparing vulnerabilities between different products. However, there are a few products which seem extremely emotional: The Operating System, Office, and the browser.
 We already discussed pretty emotionally</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: IE and Firefox vulnerabilities</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/rhalbheer/archive/2007/11/30/ie-and-firefox-vulnerabilities.aspx#2597927</link><pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 11:30:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2597927</guid><dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;These figures could be correct if both sides would disclose all hidden fixes. If they are not, one is actually fixing the figures instead of vulnerabilities, and thus count is so wrong.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2597927" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>