<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Comparing Search Data Retention Policies of Major Search Engines Before the EU </title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/privacyimperative/archive/2009/02/10/comparing-search-data-retention-policies-of-major-search-engines-before-the-eu.aspx</link><description>Today, I testified before the Article 29 Working Party , the Europe Commission group charged with providing advice to the EU and member states on the protection of personal data. The Article 29 Working Party hearing examined the data anonymization practices</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>michaelzimmer.org &amp;raquo; Comparing Search Data Retention Policies of Major Search Engines</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/privacyimperative/archive/2009/02/10/comparing-search-data-retention-policies-of-major-search-engines-before-the-eu.aspx#3202307</link><pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 02:25:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3202307</guid><dc:creator>michaelzimmer.org &amp;raquo; Comparing Search Data Retention Policies of Major Search Engines</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://michaelzimmer.org/2009/02/14/comparing-search-data-retention-policies-of-major-search-engines/"&gt;http://michaelzimmer.org/2009/02/14/comparing-search-data-retention-policies-of-major-search-engines/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3202307" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>