<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>SML Debate Continues</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/pratul/archive/2006/08/10/445789.aspx</link><description>The SML debate with Piyush continues. He has responded to my earlier post. Piyush agrees that SML is a robust specification but wonders why one should care about it. He points out that deployment-related problems should be solved through platform simplification</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator></channel></rss>