<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Designing a backup less Exchange 2010 Architecture</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/omers/archive/2010/11/05/designing-a-backup-less-exchange-2010-architecture.aspx</link><description>Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 features a new platform for high availability and site resilience that makes deploying redundant and highly available mailbox databases easier than before. But even the most extreme forms of redundancy and fault tolerance</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Designing a backup less Exchange 2010 Architecture</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/omers/archive/2010/11/05/designing-a-backup-less-exchange-2010-architecture.aspx#3381545</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 20:21:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3381545</guid><dc:creator>Exchange Expert</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;A very nicely written and useful article.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3381545" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>