Hi everyone! My name is Alex Dubec and I’m a Program Manager on the Office Trustworthy Computing Performance team. My team is responsible for compiling system requirements across Office, and I’d like to give you a behind-the-scenes look at how we determine system requirements and the hardware your computer requires to run Office 2010.
Before diving into all the details, I want to answer a question that I’m sure is on all of your minds:
In most cases, yes! CPU and RAM requirements for Office 2010 are the same as for Office 2007, so if your computer meets the Office 2007 system requirements, you can run Office 2010. A graphics chipset will help boost the performance of certain features and disk footprint has increased (more on these points later), but as general rules:
First off, I’d like to explain what level of performance you can expect from minimum-requirement hardware. The minimum hardware spec is about defining the kind of computer that an average Office customer needs to have in order to have an acceptable experience performing typical tasks. This means tasks like opening up and editing a 20-page report. Tasks like creating some simple pie charts or scatterplots that highlight your findings, and putting together a few slides summarizing your results for that meeting next Tuesday. Or even tasks like writing up your blog post about system requirements. You should also be able to comfortably run two applications simultaneously.
As you might expect, more intensive tasks benefit from fast chips, more RAM, or speedy hard drives, and newer hardware makes everyday tasks faster – but the hardware requirements aren’t about making Office 2010 blazing fast, or about running several applications at once, or about crunching financial models in a giant spreadsheet. They’re simply about getting typical tasks done.
A lot of other pieces of software carry both “minimum” and “recommended” hardware requirements, and you might be wondering why Office 2010 doesn’t have “recommended” requirements. The reason for this is that customers have told us that understanding hardware requirements can be confusing, and the difference in meaning between “minimum” and “recommended” requirements isn’t all that clear. For example, if the minimum RAM requirement for a program is listed as 1 GB, but 2 GB is recommended, what does that really mean? Does the customer need 1 GB or 2 GB? By including minimums, we’ve tried to make the hardware requirements as clear as possible.
CPU and RAM requirements approximately doubled between Office 2003 and Office 2007, as you can see below:
One of the pieces of feedback we’ve received from customers is that they really, really hate having to buy new hardware every time a new version of Office is released. With that in mind, one of our goals for the Office 2010 was to make sure that the minimum hardware requirement would not increase from Office 2007. We invested in improving the customer experience on minimum-requirement hardware, and we regularly tested performance throughout the development cycle. Our footprint has gotten larger since Office 2007, but we’re proud to say that we’ve succeeded in keeping the CPU and RAM requirements the same as for Office 2007.
To be objective about our hardware requirements, we maintain a performance test lab of machines with the following specifications:
I have one of these machines in my office, and when I got it I couldn’t help but laugh: it was manufactured in January 2000. Maintaining that machine and our lab becomes more challenging as time goes on – this hardware hasn’t been in production for years, and it keeps getting harder to find replacement parts when stuff breaks!
We verified our requirements using this hardware with the following tests:
With this data in hand, we’re comfortable with a 500 MHz CPU and 256 MB of RAM as appropriate minimum requirements for Office 2010. To give this a bit of context, some of the least powerful computers available today are netbooks, and our data suggests that the average current netbook has a 1.6 GHz CPU and 1 GB of RAM – which is significantly more powerful than our minimum requirement.
We haven’t changed the CPU or RAM requirements from Office 2007, but the footprint of most Office applications have gotten larger. These changes force us to increase the system requirements – most standalone application disk-space requirements have gone up by 0.5 GB and the suites have increased by 1.0 or 1.5 GB.
There are a few reasons for these changes:
To determine which operating systems would be supported for Office 2010, we prioritized based on usage statistics for a given OS, as well as the engineering costs associated with ensuring compatibility and providing customer support for that OS. The following charts summarize OS compatibility for Office 2010.
If you’ve checked out Office 2010’s full system requirements, you’ve probably noticed the new graphics processor (GPU) requirement, and might be wondering what that’s all about. Another piece of feedback we received after releasing Office 2007 is that customers were interested in harnessing more of the potential of their PCs. Many computers in 2007 and most computers today have graphics processors separate from the CPU (this doesn’t necessarily mean a dedicated graphics card; for example, most laptops don’t have a physical graphics card, but do come with a graphics processor). If your computer has a GPU, it lets us perform graphics rendering tasks (like drawing charts in Excel, or transitions in PowerPoint) in the GPU instead of in the CPU, which parallelizes work and speeds up performance. This is particularly relevant for users of PowerPoint 2010, which will introduce some awesome new graphics and video integration features (more info at the PowerPoint team blog).
We chose to design for Microsoft® DirectX® 9.0c compliant graphics processors with 64 MB video memory. These processors were widely available in 2007, and most computers available today include a graphics processor that meets or exceed this standard. However, like our CPU and RAM requirements, this requirement is targeted for typical tasks – if you intensively use graphics features, you’ll benefit from a more powerful GPU.
If you want to verify the specs of the graphics core in your computer, the DirectX Diagnostic Tool will help:
Again, to put this requirement in context, the graphics chipsets in many netbooks are capable of using up to 224 MB or 256 MB of memory – which greatly exceeds our system requirement.
If you’re interested in upgrading from Office 2007, and you don’t have a GPU that meets the requirement, don’t worry – you can still use Office 2010. A graphics processor that meets or exceeds the standard will help speed up some of the graphics features you’ve used in earlier versions of Office, and it will help you use advanced transitions, animations, and video features new to PowerPoint 2010. We think a graphics processor will enhance your Office 2010 experience, but again, if your computer doesn’t have one, you can still run Office 2010.
It will come as no surprise that the performance of Office 2010 benefits more RAM, a faster CPU, or newer hardware. If you’re looking to buy a new computer, or if you’re running Windows Vista, Windows 7, or Windows Server 2008, you probably already have a machine that far exceeds the minimum requirements for Office 2010 (although you should check first, just to be safe). That said, I hope that I’ve given you some insight into how we develop system requirements and what they represent. Thanks for reading!
Great news! I'll probably upgrade to Office 2010 in my 3 machines:
- Pentium 4 HT 3GHz, 1.25GB RAM, NVIDIA GeForce 6200 256MB RAM, running Windows Vista SP2
- An HP laptop with a AMD Turion 64X2 1.90GHz, 2GB RAM, NVIDIA GeForce 7150M 64MB RAM with Windows Vista SP2
- A Lenovo laptop with an Intel Core 2 Duo 2.01GHz, 2GB RAM, Intel GMA 4500 Integrated Graphics, running Windows 7
I hope these machines are ready for Office 2010 ;)
Best regards from Peru! :D
Those are great news, specially harnessing the GPU.
I would like to see even use of the GPU for calculating multiple charts at once via Direct Compute or something.
OK but office 2007 x64 will not run on xp x64?
Goodbye ms office hello openoffice...
When will Microsoft release information on creating an SCCM WQL Query and SQL Report to find computers that both can and cannot upgrade to Office 2010. Our company had a lot of issues in the upgrade from Office 2003 to Office 2007, and, this would help us and others avoid any issues
Seems like there are some problem issues with 2010 client against older server versions (like 2003 server) that touch very basic features like meeting booking. You could ask why dont upgrade to 2010 server? If it's up to me, yes! But often this depends on a lot of other stuff like organisation policy. I, personally want to try beta sw because I like to explore new stuff, but when backwards compatibility is broken on a basic feature like meeting booking, I become very disappointed. What to do, uninstall Office 2010, but then, welcome to hell. Office 2010 overwrite/removes files in system32 that Outlook 2007 uses. Reinstalling outlook 2007 did not solve the problem. But reinstalling the OS does. HAPPY BETAING..
64 bit, YAY
What about the System Requirements for the Macintosh version of Office 2010???
Howcome no XP 64 bit. Seems like an awful number of SERVER operating systems supported by no XP64???
In this topic say about ms office 2010, and teem work process and this software quality.
<a herf="http://www.sapiencebpo.com" rel="dofollow">bpo/kpo process</a>
Nice to see that office 2010 has come. Gonna try it.
Ehh, you're specks SEEM great, but I'm still a hardcore Mac user.
Alex, you'd rather switch to Open Office than load Windows 7 ?
I think you ought to give Windows 7 a try.
Its good,if we don't have a GPU that meets the requirement,we can still use Office 2010.its better then ms office.
yeah I'm really sure I can fun Office 2010 or 2007 on a 500MHz processor with 256MB RAM...
Stop spreading BS !