<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>DNS Client Name Resolution behavior in Windows Vista vs. Windows XP</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/networking/archive/2009/04/16/dns-client-name-resolution-behavior-in-windows-vista-vs-windows-xp.aspx</link><description>In Windows, the DNS Client service is the client component that resolves and caches Domain Name System (DNS) domain names. When the DNS Client service receives a request to resolve a DNS name that it does not contain in its cache, it queries an assigned</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: DNS Client Name Resolution behavior in Windows Vista vs. Windows XP</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/networking/archive/2009/04/16/dns-client-name-resolution-behavior-in-windows-vista-vs-windows-xp.aspx#3319807</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 12:12:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3319807</guid><dc:creator>David Pentland</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;... in our case, it could simply be that Windows Vista and 7 do not respect the DHCP option 135 &amp;quot;Domain suffix search order&amp;quot; which we have set in our DHCP, whereas Windows XP always has?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;See: &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.winvistatips.com/domain-suffix-search-order-t727032.html"&gt;http://www.winvistatips.com/domain-suffix-search-order-t727032.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;David.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3319807" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: DNS Client Name Resolution behavior in Windows Vista vs. Windows XP</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/networking/archive/2009/04/16/dns-client-name-resolution-behavior-in-windows-vista-vs-windows-xp.aspx#3319803</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 12:02:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3319803</guid><dc:creator>David Pentland</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the pointer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In our case, 'ping &amp;lt;host&amp;gt;' on Windows XP was working fine, but on Windows 7 was giving 'Unknown host'. I could explicitly ping '&amp;lt;host&amp;gt;.y.ac.uk' though.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;ipconfig /all&amp;quot; on Win XP showed 'DNS Suffix Search List' = &amp;quot;x.y.ac.uk, y.ac.uk, ac.uk&amp;quot; but same on Windows 7 only showed &amp;quot;x.y.ac.uk&amp;quot; although both OS &amp;nbsp;get thier IP in same way from our MS DHCP.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;None of the &amp;quot;DNS Client&amp;quot; GP settings such as the one you mentioned above or the '...Suffix Devlolution' one worked for us but setting GP &amp;quot;Computer Configuration -&amp;gt; Administrative Templates -&amp;gt; Network -&amp;gt; DNS Client -&amp;gt; DNS Suffix Search List&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;x.y.ac.uk, y.ac.uk, ac.uk&amp;quot; fixed it. &amp;quot;ipconfig /all&amp;quot; DNS Suffix display now matches our Win XP one, and 'ping &amp;lt;host&amp;gt;' now works fine on 7.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Still unclear where XP is getting its suffix search list from and why 7 is not getting same, but at least I can now make 7 work using this GP setting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;David.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3319803" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: DNS Client Name Resolution behavior in Windows Vista vs. Windows XP</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/networking/archive/2009/04/16/dns-client-name-resolution-behavior-in-windows-vista-vs-windows-xp.aspx#3294072</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:09:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3294072</guid><dc:creator>Radacan</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I could'nt understand why my XP PC's could resolve my internal owa domian name, but the Vista business machines couldn't find the site by name. Thanks VERY much, very useful info. problem now sorted. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3294072" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: DNS Client Name Resolution behavior in Windows Vista vs. Windows XP</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/networking/archive/2009/04/16/dns-client-name-resolution-behavior-in-windows-vista-vs-windows-xp.aspx#3292636</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:04:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3292636</guid><dc:creator>mikemillerfl</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello, &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With windows server 2008 and Windows 7, does DHCP now have the ability to push dns suffix search lists instead of using GPO's? &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you, &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mike&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3292636" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: DNS Client Name Resolution behavior in Windows Vista vs. Windows XP</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/networking/archive/2009/04/16/dns-client-name-resolution-behavior-in-windows-vista-vs-windows-xp.aspx#3272308</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:51:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3272308</guid><dc:creator>güvenlik sistemleri</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;windows xp explained what I did something very nice thank you&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3272308" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: DNS Client Name Resolution behavior in Windows Vista vs. Windows XP</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/networking/archive/2009/04/16/dns-client-name-resolution-behavior-in-windows-vista-vs-windows-xp.aspx#3271665</link><pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 05:18:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3271665</guid><dc:creator>Sneh</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Stefan: Please try rebooting the XP machine and see if that helps&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also how are you checking that the XP machine is appending the suffix list?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please do not use nslookup as a test.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3271665" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: DNS Client Name Resolution behavior in Windows Vista vs. Windows XP</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/networking/archive/2009/04/16/dns-client-name-resolution-behavior-in-windows-vista-vs-windows-xp.aspx#3257269</link><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 23:44:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3257269</guid><dc:creator>stefanbuffalo</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I put the registry entry with DWORD=0 into Win XP Pro, however it seems that the DNS suffix search list is still being traversed to append DNS suffixes. Do you have any futher info to turn this off?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thnx.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3257269" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: DNS Client Name Resolution behavior in Windows Vista vs. Windows XP</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/networking/archive/2009/04/16/dns-client-name-resolution-behavior-in-windows-vista-vs-windows-xp.aspx#3237805</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 20:55:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3237805</guid><dc:creator>Michael Schell</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I imagine it's to speed up negative name resolution by discarding queries that are very unlikely to produce a positive response (appending the search list to a name that's already multi-label).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3237805" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: DNS Client Name Resolution behavior in Windows Vista vs. Windows XP</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/networking/archive/2009/04/16/dns-client-name-resolution-behavior-in-windows-vista-vs-windows-xp.aspx#3227680</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 20:53:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3227680</guid><dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;That's an interesting tidbit, but can anyone put this in context and explain the reason for the change between XP and Vista?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3227680" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: DNS Client Name Resolution behavior in Windows Vista vs. Windows XP</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/networking/archive/2009/04/16/dns-client-name-resolution-behavior-in-windows-vista-vs-windows-xp.aspx#3227342</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 23:21:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3227342</guid><dc:creator>domain finder</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;this is very helpful most especially to first timers. im starting to make my own website and it's good that i read this article.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3227342" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>