<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Balancing Act - What you really ought to know about Windows Server NLB</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/networking/archive/2008/12/09/balancing-act-what-you-really-ought-to-know-about-windows-server-nlb.aspx</link><description>BALANCING ACT Managing the multiple data streams comprising today&amp;#8217;s enterprise networks can turn into a digital balancing act.&amp;#160; This blog series hopes to assist you in achieving that &amp;#8220;Zen-like&amp;#8221; symbiosis that we all want.&amp;#160;</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Balancing Act - What you really ought to know about Windows Server NLB</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/networking/archive/2008/12/09/balancing-act-what-you-really-ought-to-know-about-windows-server-nlb.aspx#3259075</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 23:03:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3259075</guid><dc:creator>Pete Sullivan</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The issue with NLB and Layer 3 or &amp;quot;Smart&amp;quot; switches is a fact of the function of the technology. &amp;nbsp;It can be worked around as simply as utilizing a Layer 2 VLAN on &amp;nbsp;your Layer 3 switch. There are some great new enhancements as well for NLB with Windows 2008 R2. &amp;nbsp;One is the concept of &amp;quot;Extended Affinity&amp;quot; and the other is the use of Powershell as the new NLB command line interface.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here's a great link &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc725691.aspx"&gt;http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc725691.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3259075" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Balancing Act - What you really ought to know about Windows Server NLB</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/networking/archive/2008/12/09/balancing-act-what-you-really-ought-to-know-about-windows-server-nlb.aspx#3179860</link><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 10:23:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3179860</guid><dc:creator>PK</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Derwyddon:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I disagree. Delve into the technology behind Multicast and Anycats and you will see that this is just a part/drawback of using that technology. As with NLB gettig to work proberly the way it works right now, these techniques are a neccesary part.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You could argue that MS should not use multicast/anycast anymore. But I sure don't have an alternative which enables al current features, do you?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I will agree with you this far; the real misser here i that you need to use a hub or 'dumb down' your L3 switch AND NIC teaming does not work.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dumbing down your switch or using a HUB result in a single point of faillure in your switching network (we use a redundant network of smart switches in the networking core)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now you have high cost redundant network, a redundant set of computers (running NLB) and no way of attaching it to several redundant routers without introducing problems.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Luckily we do not have the above problem; HP switches (series 2600 and up) handle the traffic fine, even amongst switches (although broadcasting over every port; which is a drawback of using multicast)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3179860" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Balancing Act - What you really ought to know about Windows Server NLB</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/networking/archive/2008/12/09/balancing-act-what-you-really-ought-to-know-about-windows-server-nlb.aspx#3169172</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 21:04:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3169172</guid><dc:creator>Derwyddon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;You know that advice to use switch level 2 or even hubs (really a switch level 1) is to advice that we should use windows 98 in place present networking technology. You should think why, if you select this balancing technology, you should use a &amp;quot;deprecated&amp;quot; networking technology (of course, you can use win98 if you want).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3169172" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>