<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Windows Wireless and Cisco ACS Machine Access Restriction don’t always play nice together</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/networking/archive/2008/03/21/windows-wireless-and-cisco-acs-machine-access-restriction-don-t-always-play-nice-together.aspx</link><description>Recently, I have been seeing a number of customers reporting problems attempting to implement a specific feature of Cisco's Access Control Server (ACS) 4.0. This feature is called Machine Access Restriction (MAR). 
 The issue that arises is that this</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Windows Wireless and Cisco ACS Machine Access Restriction don’t always play nice together</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/networking/archive/2008/03/21/windows-wireless-and-cisco-acs-machine-access-restriction-don-t-always-play-nice-together.aspx#3318252</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:40:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3318252</guid><dc:creator>CiscoACS User</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;We have also setup the MAR Cache timer to be 45 days. That is setup to avoid the issue mentioned &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/904943"&gt;http://support.microsoft.com/kb/904943&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3318252" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Windows Wireless and Cisco ACS Machine Access Restriction don’t always play nice together</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/networking/archive/2008/03/21/windows-wireless-and-cisco-acs-machine-access-restriction-don-t-always-play-nice-together.aspx#3318249</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:34:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3318249</guid><dc:creator>CiscoACS User</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Has anyone successfully implemented Machine Access Restriction using Cisco ACS? We are trying to get around this issue by enforcing the AuthMode registry key &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/929847"&gt;http://support.microsoft.com/kb/929847&lt;/a&gt;. It does not seem to be working. User authentication is still taking place.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3318249" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Windows Wireless and Cisco ACS Machine Access Restriction don’t always play nice together</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/networking/archive/2008/03/21/windows-wireless-and-cisco-acs-machine-access-restriction-don-t-always-play-nice-together.aspx#3271576</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 19:42:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3271576</guid><dc:creator>sysons</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;has anybody seen a working cisco MAR feature used for both user &amp;amp; machine authentication (cert); &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;components - cisco WiSM, 3100AP, ACS-Radius, windows AD/GPO/2003 server, Win XP client on EAF-Fast?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3271576" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Windows Wireless and Cisco ACS Machine Access Restriction don’t always play nice together</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/networking/archive/2008/03/21/windows-wireless-and-cisco-acs-machine-access-restriction-don-t-always-play-nice-together.aspx#3263353</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:59:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3263353</guid><dc:creator>Harpreet (Harry)</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;As Usual Clay, your Blogs are very informational.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3263353" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>