<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>SCCM packages may be distributed slower than standard file copy (xcopy/Windows Explorer)</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/nettracer/archive/2010/10/05/sccm-packages-may-be-distributed-slower-than-standard-file-copy-xcopy-windows-explorer.aspx</link><description>Hi there, 
 
 In this post, I&amp;rsquo;m going to mention about another issue where I helped a colleague of mine to troubleshoot an SCCM package distribution scenario. The problem was that package distribution to clients were visibly slower compared to</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: SCCM packages may be distributed slower than standard file copy (xcopy/Windows Explorer)</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/nettracer/archive/2010/10/05/sccm-packages-may-be-distributed-slower-than-standard-file-copy-xcopy-windows-explorer.aspx#3421170</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 10:43:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3421170</guid><dc:creator>MuratKa1</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Michel,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As per the latest feedback I got from SCCM colleagues, it looks like this is the by design behavior in SCCM and it&amp;#39;s unlikely that we will see a change in the behavior at teh current version. May be SCCM&amp;#39;s next version could be designed differently.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hope this helps&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Murat&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3421170" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: SCCM packages may be distributed slower than standard file copy (xcopy/Windows Explorer)</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/nettracer/archive/2010/10/05/sccm-packages-may-be-distributed-slower-than-standard-file-copy-xcopy-windows-explorer.aspx#3417532</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 12:44:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3417532</guid><dc:creator>Michel</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Murat, Any updates to this?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cheers&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3417532" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>