<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Time for your NAP</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/nap/archive/2007/03/01/time-for-your-nap.aspx</link><description>I don't remember when I first starting hearing about Network Access Protection (NAP) but I know it was over a year ago, because I used to mention it in passing when I talked to customers about Windows Server 2003 R2 . I think it was originally a feature</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>Network Access Protection</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/nap/archive/2007/03/01/time-for-your-nap.aspx#2178157</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 20:12:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2178157</guid><dc:creator>TechNet Team Blog Austria</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Wie kann man sich sicher sein, dass der Rechner, der sich gerade am Netzwerk anmeldet, auch wirklich&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2178157" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Le cordonnier est-il bien chaussé, le sujet du jour: NAP</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/nap/archive/2007/03/01/time-for-your-nap.aspx#2173438</link><pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 22:44:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2173438</guid><dc:creator>A few things you may not already know</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Vous vous demandez peut &amp;#234;tre si nous utilisons les produits que nous sommes sur le point de rendre disponibles,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2173438" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Microsoft IT: 120,000 NAP Clients deployed - it's just too darn easy!</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/nap/archive/2007/03/01/time-for-your-nap.aspx#1747172</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 19:49:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:1747172</guid><dc:creator>Network Access Protection (NAP)</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello All, Brent Atkison here with the deployment team responsible for rolling out Network Access Protection&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1747172" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Short NAP: Tuesday 20 March 2007</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/nap/archive/2007/03/01/time-for-your-nap.aspx#700893</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 03:40:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:700893</guid><dc:creator>travelling without moving</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I've been speedlinking some interesting Network Access Protection links in the past (which you can find&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=700893" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Time for your NAP (follow-up /corrections)</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/nap/archive/2007/03/01/time-for-your-nap.aspx#697008</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 00:10:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:697008</guid><dc:creator>Network Access Protection (NAP)</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I wanted to follow-up on Adam's great post from last week on NAP's roll-out here within Microsoft. He&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=697008" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Time for your NAP</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/nap/archive/2007/03/01/time-for-your-nap.aspx#676393</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 05:38:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:676393</guid><dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the post and for giving us a bit more insight. &amp;nbsp;Truly admins with Real Jobs (tm) eagerly await. :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=676393" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>A Multi Grab Bag</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/nap/archive/2007/03/01/time-for-your-nap.aspx#669377</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 20:00:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:669377</guid><dc:creator>Windows Server Division WebLog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;CNET reported that Oracle &amp;quot;quietly cut software prices on some lower-end servers using multicore processors.&amp;quot; Un-related to this, if you're interested in the network access control capabilities in Longhorn, check out Adam's post about NAP.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=669377" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>special guest host</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/nap/archive/2007/03/01/time-for-your-nap.aspx#667851</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 05:19:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:667851</guid><dc:creator>Ad Nauseam - ramblings of a technologist</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I got to be a guest blogger on the NAP team blog today. You can read my post here .&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=667851" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>