<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>802.1x NAP Enforcement</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/nap/archive/2006/05/31/444128.aspx</link><description>In my last post I committed to coming back and giving you a more information on the many enforcement options available with Network Access Protection (VPN, DHCP, IPSEC, 802.1x). 
 
 With that in mind I thought I would start with 802.1x based Network</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>markwilson.it &amp;raquo; Microsoft infrastructure architecture considerations: part 3 (controlling network access)</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/nap/archive/2006/05/31/444128.aspx#3109522</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 11:01:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3109522</guid><dc:creator>markwilson.it &amp;raquo; Microsoft infrastructure architecture considerations: part 3 (controlling network access)</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.markwilson.co.uk/blog/2008/08/microsoft-infrastructure-architecture-considerations-part-3-controlling-network-access.htm"&gt;http://www.markwilson.co.uk/blog/2008/08/microsoft-infrastructure-architecture-considerations-part-3-controlling-network-access.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3109522" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network Access Protection (NAP) and my switches</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/nap/archive/2006/05/31/444128.aspx#3079788</link><pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 08:10:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3079788</guid><dc:creator>Network Access Protection (NAP) and my switches</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://cnnene.net/?p=726"&gt;http://cnnene.net/?p=726&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3079788" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network Access Protection (NAP) and my switches</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/nap/archive/2006/05/31/444128.aspx#3063025</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 01:47:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3063025</guid><dc:creator>PFE Ireland</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I recently gave an overview of NAP at a Windows Server 2008 event.&amp;amp;#160; For the purposes of the event&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3063025" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: 802.1x NAP Enforcement</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/nap/archive/2006/05/31/444128.aspx#464411</link><pubDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2006 05:00:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:464411</guid><dc:creator>Michael Greene</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Mudit. &amp;nbsp;The question was based on trying to leverage NAP with workgroup machines. &amp;nbsp;I have since learned that you can prompt the user for auth if the computer cannot be authenticated.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=464411" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: 802.1x NAP Enforcement</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/nap/archive/2006/05/31/444128.aspx#458885</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 20:57:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:458885</guid><dc:creator>mudit.goel</dc:creator><description>Michael -
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Unfortunately, 1x NAP requires an account to be authenticated before it gets access to the network. It could either be a user account or a machine account.
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;However, if the problem is to avoid having a separate account for every individual (since authentication is not required in your scenario), you can use guest authentication.
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;For instance, you can use PEAP-EAP-MSCHAPV2, enable guest account in NPS, set a basic password (could be empty if your policies permit it) and then configure each machine to use the empty username (will get mapped to guest account on the backend) and the guest account password.
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;However, I might be able to help you better if you can explain your scenario better. For instance, why are you using 1x when you dont require authentication on your network.
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Thanks,
&lt;br&gt;Mudit Goel
&lt;br&gt;Development Manager,
&lt;br&gt;Windows Enterprise Networking Group&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=458885" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: 802.1x NAP Enforcement</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/nap/archive/2006/05/31/444128.aspx#457380</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 06:51:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:457380</guid><dc:creator>Michael Greene</dc:creator><description>Would this scenario work if the NPS policy was set to enforce NAP but not to require authentication? &amp;nbsp;I'm thinking in terms of machines that are not domain members.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=457380" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Secure Wireless Access NOW!</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/nap/archive/2006/05/31/444128.aspx#444477</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 07:00:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:444477</guid><dc:creator>Network Access Protection (NAP)</dc:creator><description>A couple weeks ago I wrote and told you about how 802.1x based Network Access Protection (NAP) works.&amp;amp;amp;nbsp;This...&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=444477" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>