Running Microsoft.com on 64 Bit…The Dependencies, The Goodness, the Gotcha’s

IIS x64 resources

Steve Schofield's Blog — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 07:48:56 GMT

I was reading up on 64 bit and comparsions to 32 bit. This is a few links with some highlights that stuck

IIS x64 resources

Steve Schofield Weblog — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 07:09:39 GMT

I was reading up on 64 bit and comparsions to 32 bit. This is a few links with some highlights that stuck

re: Running Microsoft.com on 64 Bit…The Dependencies, The Goodness, the Gotcha’s

banhinc — Mon, 10 Sep 2007 06:00:39 GMT

With the SPA response time comparison, it does look like X64 had a significant improvement. But what was the CPU speed/configuration and amount RAM between the server hardware? It seems like the improvement came from large increase in addressable memory.

re: Running Microsoft.com on 64 Bit…The Dependencies, The Goodness, the Gotcha’s

Ed Ralph — Thu, 08 Dec 2005 15:40:04 GMT

Do you have any stats on 32bit vs 64bit SQL Server (2000 or 2005)?

re: Running Microsoft.com on 64 Bit…The Dependencies, The Goodness, the Gotcha’s

Colin Barnhorst MVP — Wed, 07 Dec 2005 09:58:42 GMT

Gotcha number 1 can take unusual forms. Some of the third parties who provide things like defraggers seem to think that editions of their products that support XP Pro x64 should cost more than editions that only support XP Pro x86. The community needs to educate these providers on what going 64 means and does not necessarily mean. If much of that happens with Vista x64 there will be some speed bumps.