<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Morello's Blog - All Comments</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/morello/</link><description>Information on private clouds, datacenters, Azure, security, and PKI.</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>Microsoft, Check Point take virtual appliances seriously | ????????-?????????? (techno-bites)</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/morello/archive/2008/08/13/deployment-security-designs-for-forefront-iag-uag-virtual-appliances.aspx#3108517</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:29:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3108517</guid><dc:creator>Microsoft, Check Point take virtual appliances seriously | ????????-?????????? (techno-bites)</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.kiwinet.co.il/wp/?p=96"&gt;http://www.kiwinet.co.il/wp/?p=96&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3108517" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Klastrować CA czy nie?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/morello/archive/2008/07/21/to-cluster-or-not-to-cluster-cas.aspx#3092418</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 16:27:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3092418</guid><dc:creator>Windows Server 2008</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Active Directory Certificate Services w Windows Server 2008 mogą być budowane na 2 nodowym klastrze active/passive.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3092418" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: idNexus 3.0 released</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/morello/archive/2005/08/09/408890.aspx#414966</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 23:39:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:414966</guid><dc:creator>DaveW</dc:creator><description>Hi, Is there any information available yet about MS acquisition or about Longhorn PKI in general?&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=414966" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: the Microsoft HSPD-12 / FIPS 201 / PIV solution</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/morello/archive/2005/11/01/413481.aspx#414965</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 23:38:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:414965</guid><dc:creator>DaveW</dc:creator><description>Excellent article... very well written and informative.&lt;br&gt;I've been considering idNexus for an account I'm working on and I've seen nothing but positives from Microsoft... it'll be interesting to see how the acquisition works out.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=414965" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>