<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>USMT 4.0 Support for Office 2010</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/mniehaus/archive/2011/02/02/usmt-4-0-support-for-office-2010.aspx</link><description>A new hotfix for USMT 4.0 was released today to support migrating Office 2010 settings. (It includes other fixes too.) You may want to download this and integrate it into your deployment processes. The full instructions for doing this (including what</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: USMT 4.0 Support for Office 2010</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/mniehaus/archive/2011/02/02/usmt-4-0-support-for-office-2010.aspx#3560359</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 10:15:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3560359</guid><dc:creator>wesley E Batton</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://office-2010.iyogi.com/&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Office"&gt;office-2010.iyogi.com/&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Office&lt;/a&gt; 2010 Support &amp;lt;/a&amp;gt; in sage Act!2011&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;definately office can easily install any operating system whether it is 32 bit or 64 bit.In Act 2011 worked only 32 bit little bit diffrence and the 25 features are added by Microsoft office 2010 &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for haring us.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3560359" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: USMT 4.0 Support for Office 2010</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/mniehaus/archive/2011/02/02/usmt-4-0-support-for-office-2010.aspx#3485672</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 11:09:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3485672</guid><dc:creator>Markus</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#39;s me again. I found the reason of the problem. The DlManifests folder must be located in the USMT folder - NOT in any subfolder.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3485672" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: USMT 4.0 Support for Office 2010</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/mniehaus/archive/2011/02/02/usmt-4-0-support-for-office-2010.aspx#3391338</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 17:12:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3391338</guid><dc:creator>Michael Niehaus</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Correct, the fix is only for ConfigMgr-integrated scenarios.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is a separate fix in ZTIUserState.wsf that is unaffected by the USMT hotfix. &amp;nbsp;(This fix just sets the working directory to the folder containing the USMT binaries.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-Michael&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3391338" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: USMT 4.0 Support for Office 2010</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/mniehaus/archive/2011/02/02/usmt-4-0-support-for-office-2010.aspx#3391328</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 16:38:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3391328</guid><dc:creator>JoeZeppy</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;So I&amp;#39;m unclear here. If I&amp;#39;m just using MDT lite touch deployment, I don&amp;#39;t need to modify the ZTIUserState file?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3391328" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: USMT 4.0 Support for Office 2010</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/mniehaus/archive/2011/02/02/usmt-4-0-support-for-office-2010.aspx#3385341</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 09:09:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3385341</guid><dc:creator>Michael Niehaus</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Good point, I didn&amp;#39;t mention which file contained that logic - it&amp;#39;s ZTIUserState.wsf. &amp;nbsp;I&amp;#39;ve updated the article above.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-Michael&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3385341" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: USMT 4.0 Support for Office 2010</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/mniehaus/archive/2011/02/02/usmt-4-0-support-for-office-2010.aspx#3385340</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 09:06:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3385340</guid><dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for this information. Just one question, which XML file should I edit?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3385340" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: USMT 4.0 Support for Office 2010</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/mniehaus/archive/2011/02/02/usmt-4-0-support-for-office-2010.aspx#3385310</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 03:35:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3385310</guid><dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I don&amp;#39;t suppose one of the fixes includes trying to exclude both local profiles and profiles older than a given age when migrating from WinXP?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3385310" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: USMT 4.0 Support for Office 2010</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/mniehaus/archive/2011/02/02/usmt-4-0-support-for-office-2010.aspx#3384699</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 07:53:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3384699</guid><dc:creator>Michael Niehaus</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Oops, you&amp;#39;re right - that&amp;#39;s what I get for not testing the change :-) &amp;nbsp;I&amp;#39;ve fixed the article above.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-Michael&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3384699" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: USMT 4.0 Support for Office 2010</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/mniehaus/archive/2011/02/02/usmt-4-0-support-for-office-2010.aspx#3384698</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 07:49:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3384698</guid><dc:creator>Lasse Balsvad</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Remember to put in parentheses when using the OR operator. Else the expression will evaluate to true if the fileversion of scanstate i = &amp;quot;6.1.7601.21645&amp;quot;. But if the version of scanstate can only be &amp;quot;6.1.7601.21645&amp;quot; on XP. Then it&amp;#39;s OK. Else the correct expression should be as follows:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If (oEnvironment.Item(&amp;quot;DeploymentMethod&amp;quot;) = &amp;quot;SCCM&amp;quot; and oEnvironment.Item(&amp;quot;OSVersion&amp;quot;) = &amp;quot;XP&amp;quot;) and (oFSO.GetFileVersion(sFoundScanState) = &amp;quot;6.1.7600.16385&amp;quot; or oFSO.GetFileVersion(sFoundScanState) = &amp;quot;6.1.7601.21645&amp;quot;) then&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3384698" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>