<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"><channel><title>SCCM 2007 RC1 and NAP integration first thoughts</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/mkleef/archive/2007/07/24/sccm-2007-rc1-and-nap-integration-first-thoughts.aspx</link><description>So if you saw my last post on SCCM 2007's install you'll get the idea that I'm still somewhat unimpressed with the initial setup of the product. I think its still a little messy and requires knowledge outside of the prerequisite checker. Hopefully that</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>TechEd NAP and SCCM Session Question</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/mkleef/archive/2007/07/24/sccm-2007-rc1-and-nap-integration-first-thoughts.aspx#1730744</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 06:42:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:1730744</guid><dc:creator>Michael Kleef ::: MSFT</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I had a good question from Jan yesterday after my TechEd session. She posted a comment to my article&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1730744" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: SCCM 2007 RC1 and NAP integration first thoughts</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/mkleef/archive/2007/07/24/sccm-2007-rc1-and-nap-integration-first-thoughts.aspx#1727084</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 10:49:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:1727084</guid><dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Michael - met you in this afternoon's &amp;quot;Building Platform Remediation with NAP &amp;amp; SCCM2007&amp;quot; - i had the question about SCCM WakeUp. &amp;nbsp;Our environment moves machines powered off into a different vlan, consequently they get a different ip address there, til they're booted up and authenticated again (we have cisco switches and we're using 802.1x). &amp;nbsp;I have SMSWakeUp and am working on a workaround, but if that works, it will simply have an agent wake up the whole subnet. &amp;nbsp;Look forward to your answer :-)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;thanks Jan&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1727084" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>