Adding our Voice to Concerns about Search in Europe

re: Adding our Voice to Concerns about Search in Europe

Edwardsimon — Sat, 24 Nov 2012 12:50:27 GMT

An impressive post, I just gave this to a colleague who is doing a little analysis on this topic. And he is very happy and thanking me for finding it. But all thanks to you for writing in such simple words. Big thumb up for this blog post!

www.facebook.com/jobopeningz

re: Adding our Voice to Concerns about Search in Europe

JOe — Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:47:51 GMT

a taste of your own medicine, this is what microsoft used to do, monopolize LOL good for Google

re: Adding our Voice to Concerns about Search in Europe

Paolo Pomponi — Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:25:00 GMT

Fax sent on 15 April 2011 to Google Inc.: Subject: Google +1 Button concept: fraud. http://tiny.cc/3g1l9

re: Adding our Voice to Concerns about Search in Europe

lololol — Mon, 11 Apr 2011 18:35:40 GMT

y u mad tho microsoft :(

re: Adding our Voice to Concerns about Search in Europe

Paolo paolo.pomponi@gmail.com — Mon, 11 Apr 2011 14:39:08 GMT

Look what they do to me.....

The steal and copy my concept of +1

hybridcities.blogspot.com/.../prove-that-1-google-button-is-stolen-as.html

re: Adding our Voice to Concerns about Search in Europe

david w — Tue, 05 Apr 2011 07:54:44 GMT

Wow. People really believe this? There is no proof and they're actually afraid of the search algorithms.

Google got the lion's share by virtue of being the best not because of intentional business practices aimed at eliminating competition. Every time a company enjoys such success we let our government take it away and monitor what's left.

Being Google I would separate the various branches now and let their famous search engine put it all back together becuase it will. Their results have nothing to do with advertising except where paid advertisers will hit the top of the list. So small business don't hit the top of the list. What about the superbowl commercials? same thing. Let's have anti-trust suits agains the NFL, NBA, ABA and NHL. They determine who sponsors and oddly enough it's usually based upon money not anything else. If you think that's wrong go ahead and flame me because I'm tired of Microsoft who owns Windows and more than 67% of the PC Operating SYstem Market.

Who needs a decision engine? I make my own.

re: Adding our Voice to Concerns about Search in Europe

Mark Da Cunha — Mon, 04 Apr 2011 16:24:35 GMT

Shame on Microsoft -- what a bunch of hypocrites.

Google.com is google's property and not Microsoft's or the government's. As such, Google as the inalienable right to set the terms of their contracts as they see fit -- and if you don;t like their proposal then no on is forcing you to sign it.

Google is doing now in the "search engine wars" what Microsoft did during the "browser wars" with Internet Explorer a decade ago. And to think I defended Microsoft's right to its property.

www.capitalismmagazine.com/.../225-the-department-of-justice-s-assault-on-microsoft-who-is-the-predator-and-who-is-the-victim.html

re: Adding our Voice to Concerns about Search in Europe

Michael — Sun, 03 Apr 2011 16:02:03 GMT

You F**king Cheeky B**tards Micrsoft Go To F**king Hell!

re: Adding our Voice to Concerns about Search in Europe

nDante — Sun, 03 Apr 2011 14:54:48 GMT

¿Duele? Pues a joderse. Nadie dice nada de vuestro windows por defecto en todos los PCs. ¿De que mierda os quejais? Que caradura que tiene esta empresa.

"It's hurt? F**k you. No one say a word about windows in all new PCs. What Are you complaining about? This company has a real cheek"

re: Adding our Voice to Concerns about Search in Europe

Jon — Sun, 03 Apr 2011 08:57:49 GMT

Give us a break, Brad and Microsoft. You have a largely frivolous case, with the YouTube results claim being the only quasi-valid among the bunch. Stop wasting Microsoft's and Google's money over such garbage, and have a little respect for your users: every time you waste a few million on a case like this, the users are the ones who end up footing the bill.