<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Microsoft’s Proposal to the European Commission</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/microsoft_on_the_issues/archive/2009/07/24/microsoft-s-proposal-to-the-european-commission.aspx</link><description>Posted by David Bowermaster Administrator, Microsoft on the Issues 
 Microsoft recently made a proposal to the European Commission to address competition law concerns that the Commission has raised with regard to Internet Explorer and the interoperability</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Microsoft’s Proposal to the European Commission</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/microsoft_on_the_issues/archive/2009/07/24/microsoft-s-proposal-to-the-european-commission.aspx#3345051</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 18:51:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3345051</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;In what way can a company make a &amp;quot;proposal&amp;quot; to a public authority? That is a deterioriation of the public authority because the authority does enforce the law and decides, it does not negotiate the law (as maybe be common in the US, not in Europe). &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Annex B is a provocation. The European Parliament does not accept software patentability. Furthermore patents for web standards and internet gateway technology are totally unacceptable.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3345051" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>