<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The Official Stance on Address List Segregation</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/mbaher/archive/2011/02/05/the-official-stance-on-address-list-segregation.aspx</link><description>Copied from http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dgoldman/archive/2011/01/28/the-official-stance-on-address-list-segregation.aspx?wa=wsignin1.0 &amp;#160; Since the early days of Exchange Server our customers have used various methods to provide different views of the</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: The Official Stance on Address List Segregation</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/mbaher/archive/2011/02/05/the-official-stance-on-address-list-segregation.aspx#3443566</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 18:10:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3443566</guid><dc:creator>Ralph</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;We want to use nulty tenancy but we also use Lync 2010 and we need to have UM,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Exchange 2011 multy tenancy does not have UM&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What should we do?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3443566" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>