<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>VirtualboyTV.com: Hyper-V R2: Failover &amp; Live Migration</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/mattmcspirit/archive/2009/05/22/virtualboytv-com-hyper-v-r2-failover-live-migration.aspx</link><description>On to the final part of the mini-series on clustering, and we round off with the most exciting bit – seeing our creation come to life! In this video, I perform a number of Live Migrations, for the different VM types (VHD, Pass Through Disk and CSV), including</description><dc:language>en-GB</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: VirtualboyTV.com: Hyper-V R2: Failover &amp; Live Migration</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/mattmcspirit/archive/2009/05/22/virtualboytv-com-hyper-v-r2-failover-live-migration.aspx#3261462</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 13:48:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3261462</guid><dc:creator>MattMcSpirit</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Martin,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When you are just using pure Hyper-V, and no System Center, the failover is based on logic. &amp;nbsp;You can read all about that here: &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blogs.technet.com/mattmcspirit/archive/2009/02/03/hyper-v-clustering-virtual-machine-failover-behaviour.aspx"&gt;http://blogs.technet.com/mattmcspirit/archive/2009/02/03/hyper-v-clustering-virtual-machine-failover-behaviour.aspx&lt;/a&gt; but if you involve System Center, i.e SCOM and SCVMM, I believe that there is more intelligence involved, but I'd have to look into that one for sure! &amp;nbsp;The link above talks about 2008, and there has been improvements in R2, but I believe it's still logic-based out of the box.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hope that helps!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Matt&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3261462" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: VirtualboyTV.com: Hyper-V R2: Failover &amp; Live Migration</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/mattmcspirit/archive/2009/05/22/virtualboytv-com-hyper-v-r2-failover-live-migration.aspx#3261123</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 22:41:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3261123</guid><dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Matt&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In this video you have 2 nodes... Let's say you had 6 nodes and 1 node failed, crashed etc. How would the VM's failover in a 6 node setup?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3261123" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>