<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>64 Bit performance v 32 bit performance - some compelling evidence</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/mat_stephen/archive/2005/08/25/409796.aspx</link><description>More and more ITPros are looking for help in deciding between 64 bit and 32 bit boxes, often they are looking for evidence that 64 bit is worth the investment and worth the risk (of adopting a new platform). 
 This link http://www.microsoft.com/sql/64bit</description><dc:language>en-GB</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: 64 Bit performance v 32 bit performance - some compelling evidence</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/mat_stephen/archive/2005/08/25/409796.aspx#409910</link><pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2005 03:25:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:409910</guid><dc:creator>Buck Woody</dc:creator><description>I want the tool they used in the performance demo at TechEd 2005. I was told it's Flash, but I don't know any more than that. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is too cool!&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=409910" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>