<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The Compound Case of the Outlook Hangs</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/markrussinovich/archive/2010/08/24/3351213.aspx</link><description>This case was shared with me by a friend of mine, Andrew Richards, a Microsoft Exchange Server Escalation Engineer. It&amp;rsquo;s a really interesting case because it highlights the use of a Sysinternals tool I specifically wrote for use by Microsoft support</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: The Compound Case of the Outlook Hangs</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/markrussinovich/archive/2010/08/24/3351213.aspx#3379686</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 01:18:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3379686</guid><dc:creator>Oscar</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Better than a Dan Brown&amp;#39;s Best Seller: Sysinternals and Exchange ROCKS!!!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3379686" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: The Compound Case of the Outlook Hangs</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/markrussinovich/archive/2010/08/24/3351213.aspx#3360181</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 07:50:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3360181</guid><dc:creator>XMLFREAK</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Again Mark, you show the way to go with sysinternal tools. Thanks for making such great debugging en troubleshooting tools. On top of that thank you very much for explaining in detail how to use all these tools together. Greetings from Holland&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3360181" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: The Compound Case of the Outlook Hangs</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/markrussinovich/archive/2010/08/24/3351213.aspx#3359451</link><pubDate>Sat, 02 Oct 2010 06:08:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3359451</guid><dc:creator>BillP</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I found the trouble-shooting discussion useful, but the end result even more interesting. Reducing the &amp;quot;item count&amp;quot; in some user&amp;#39;s folders fully solved the issue. Outlook Express, still used by untold millions, has similar odd issues when the number of items in the various folders (INBOX, SENT, DRAFT, TRASH, etc.) exceeds &amp;quot;a limit&amp;quot;. In every case I&amp;#39;ve looked at, when any given folder exceeded 1 Gb. in size, Outlook Express had a variety of issues - not being able to compact folders being the most usual. In every case, deleting messages or moving them to newer folders and reducing the file size &amp;nbsp;(say below 500 Mb.) solved the problem(s).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3359451" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: The Compound Case of the Outlook Hangs</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/markrussinovich/archive/2010/08/24/3351213.aspx#3359022</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 18:14:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3359022</guid><dc:creator>jader3rd</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;While I do like the debugging that went into finding out why the Exchange server wasn&amp;#39;t being as responsive as it should have been, I don&amp;#39;t like how the issue is concidered solved. The real issue is &amp;quot;Why does Outlook hang when the server is being unresponsive?&amp;quot; Outlook is supposed to be a smart/fat client. Yet, the Outlook team has passed along most (if not all) of their performance issues onto the server. Having the UI on the client be dependent on the server is ridiculous. The Exchange team writes a more performant server and the Outlook team takes that as a free pass on not creating a more performant design of their product. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I expect the client to be perfectly responsive regardless of the performance of my connection to the server.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3359022" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: The Compound Case of the Outlook Hangs</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/markrussinovich/archive/2010/08/24/3351213.aspx#3356999</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 06:13:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3356999</guid><dc:creator>Acemutha</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#39;s always very nice to read your articles so much to learn from&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3356999" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: The Compound Case of the Outlook Hangs</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/markrussinovich/archive/2010/08/24/3351213.aspx#3356825</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 13:21:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3356825</guid><dc:creator>WinSE-4VR</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;We&amp;#39;ve had this before...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Back in 1999, on the old WinSE NT4SP6 team, we had this exact same thing happen but on Outlook. A buggy version of the standard AV package would occasionally exec-lock the mailbox pst, and Outlook would think it was corrupted and prompt the user with an ambiguous message to &amp;#39;fix&amp;#39; it. The exec lock would prevent a fix, so the pst would be flattened to 32k or whatever the default brand-new empty size was, with the usual catastrophic results. The AV patch had been pushed to the 2 main distro servers 6 months prior, but not to the team&amp;#39;s semi-private local-server-of-convenience...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Much lolz to see this again 11 years later and the scourge of 3rd party exec locks persists...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3356825" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: The Compound Case of the Outlook Hangs</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/markrussinovich/archive/2010/08/24/3351213.aspx#3354879</link><pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 21:29:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3354879</guid><dc:creator>Parkarab</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Very funny that I just read this after resolving an issue with several Outlook users here in my company. Again, Symantec corporate client was the culprit.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Seems users were upgraded to Symantec endpoint protection. Unfortunately, the Outlook add-in from corporate client v 10.1 was not removed. It kept causing unusual freezing of Outlook.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3354879" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: The Compound Case of the Outlook Hangs</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/markrussinovich/archive/2010/08/24/3351213.aspx#3353750</link><pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 17:41:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3353750</guid><dc:creator>Mike Foley</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Great article.. It reminded me of many late nights chasing locks on OpenVMS. We had a live tool that would allow us to get right into the guts of a hung system and poke around, looking for resource wait conditions. Once you found that, it was a simple (relatively) matter of tracking back to find the process that was stuck and dump its memory to see what was broken.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3353750" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: The Compound Case of the Outlook Hangs</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/markrussinovich/archive/2010/08/24/3351213.aspx#3353395</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 20:02:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3353395</guid><dc:creator>AndrewRichards</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Puneet Banga - As with any use of dbghelp.dll (e.g. in xperf, in procexp, in procmon, in WinDbg, etc.), the extent to which you can see a stack is dependant on the symbols available. Most of Windows symbols are available publically, but only a limited amount is published for other Microsoft applications.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To use the public web symbols with Xperf, use this cmd file:-&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;md C:\Symbols_Public&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;md C:\SymCache_Public&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;set _NT_SYMBOL_PATH=SRV*C:\Symbols_Public*&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://msdl.microsoft.com/download/symbols"&gt;msdl.microsoft.com/.../symbols&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;set _NT_SYMCACHE_PATH=C:\SymCache_Public&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;xperf.exe %1&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3353395" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: The Compound Case of the Outlook Hangs</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/markrussinovich/archive/2010/08/24/3351213.aspx#3353339</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 15:20:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3353339</guid><dc:creator>Hmmm</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;You said this was a &amp;quot;really interesting case&amp;quot;...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3353339" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>