<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Pushing the Limits of Windows: Handles</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/markrussinovich/archive/2009/09/29/3283844.aspx</link><description>This is the fifth post in my Pushing the Limits of Windows series where I explore the upper bound on the number and size of resources that Windows manages, such as physical memory, virtual memory, processes and threads. Here’s the index of the entire</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Pushing the Limits of Windows: Handles</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/markrussinovich/archive/2009/09/29/3283844.aspx#3521087</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:13:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3521087</guid><dc:creator>Alex Silva</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting and very explanatory.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A great post, very useful.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3521087" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Pushing the Limits of Windows: Handles</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/markrussinovich/archive/2009/09/29/3283844.aspx#3369729</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 06:45:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3369729</guid><dc:creator>Eko Indriyawan</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I just want to say that your review above is useful for us about how to understand about Handles issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Good job Mark !!!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3369729" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Pushing the Limits of Windows: Handles</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/markrussinovich/archive/2009/09/29/3283844.aspx#3344472</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 14:54:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3344472</guid><dc:creator>Stephen Boyd</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;This is by far the best explanation of Windows limits that I have seen. &amp;nbsp;It has helped me track down the cause of mysterious system crashes on our Windows 2003 Terminal Server. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank You &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3344472" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Pushing the Limits of Windows: Handles</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/markrussinovich/archive/2009/09/29/3283844.aspx#3335912</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 21:03:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3335912</guid><dc:creator>Windows 7 tricks</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice tutorial! Very well worth reading.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3335912" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Pushing the Limits of Windows: Handles</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/markrussinovich/archive/2009/09/29/3283844.aspx#3320584</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:33:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3320584</guid><dc:creator>nc</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;@giammin&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Use Process Monitor to check the stacks of the opens that don't have corresponding closes. &amp;nbsp;Check for third-party modules in the stack. Symbol configuration will help, but is likely not necessary.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3320584" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Pushing the Limits of Windows: Handles</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/markrussinovich/archive/2009/09/29/3283844.aspx#3320477</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:07:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3320477</guid><dc:creator>giammin</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Mark&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;First of all great blog and great post!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;i'm trying &amp;nbsp;to debug a strange windows explorer behavior: it opens many handles on video files and never closes them (a similar behavior like the HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\SystemFileAssociations\.avi\shellex\PropertyHandler bug).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My problem is that when i attach windbg to explorer.exe and turn on handle tracing my pc become unresponsiveness but windbg.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I can trace only many close handle due to detaching debugger.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Have you any suggestion? Thanks&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3320477" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Pushing the Limits of Windows: Handles</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/markrussinovich/archive/2009/09/29/3283844.aspx#3314876</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:36:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3314876</guid><dc:creator>nc</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;@John Hickey&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sounds like the process was creating events and not closing the handles when it was done with them. &amp;nbsp;The OS was doing what it could to accommodate the process by creating the event objects the process asked for, without questioning the process' intent. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3314876" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Pushing the Limits of Windows: Handles</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/markrussinovich/archive/2009/09/29/3283844.aspx#3314737</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:55:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3314737</guid><dc:creator>John Hickey</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Mark,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Great article. I stumbled on the article while researching a nonpaged pool leak. &amp;nbsp;I tracked the leak down to the poolmon event objects tag EVEN. I, eventually, checked the handles to discover a third party driver S7ADRV.exe with 1.5 million handles &amp;amp; climbing. This looks like the likely source of my leak.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The driver provides a link between GeFanuc iFix SCADA application and Siemen's plcs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any idea why a handle leak would cause a memory leak on the EVEN tag. The fact that the memory leak was showing up against the EVEN tag threw me off for a day.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3314737" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Pushing the Limits of Windows: Handles</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/markrussinovich/archive/2009/09/29/3283844.aspx#3302432</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 14:46:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3302432</guid><dc:creator>Dhiraj</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you this post! I really enjoyed reading it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have a question, pelase see if you can help.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We have an Exchange 2003 Setup, and at times we get an unexpected volume of email from a mal function Application. This unexpected volume increase the handle count, new mail Event objects consume non paged pool memory and bring it to threshold a system cannot sustain.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We wanted to Quantify NPP for every handle or Event objects ( In this case, it will be file (eMail), is it possible ? &amp;nbsp;This is esntailly going to help us to set threshold for our monitoring &amp;nbsp;and the way we trouble shoot. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3302432" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Pushing the Limits of Windows: Handles</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/markrussinovich/archive/2009/09/29/3283844.aspx#3299782</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 05:14:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3299782</guid><dc:creator>Palinxy</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;As always a great source of valuable information for the Windows Sys Admin!!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have recently encountered an unresponsive &amp;nbsp;W2KR2_Ent_x64 system with a Nonpaged pool memory size reaching nearly 7GB on a 16GB system, due to an Oracle.exe 10.02 process having over 4 million handles open! &amp;nbsp;Oracle was still functional and Windows returned back to normal once the offending application was shutdown.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3299782" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>