<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Kevin's TechEd 2006 Diaries - Day 2</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/kevinremde/archive/2006/06/13/435601.aspx</link><description>Day 2 &amp;ndash; A Proper TechEd Day 
 Finally got into the typical TechEd routine. Breakfast, Breakouts, and [insert something else here that starts with B that you&amp;rsquo;d find at TechEd] 
 I had another chance to witness an incredible presenter work</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Kevin's TechEd 2006 Diaries - Day 2</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/kevinremde/archive/2006/06/13/435601.aspx#435630</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 20:00:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:435630</guid><dc:creator>Keith Combs</dc:creator><description>FYI, the name draining has been around since the late 70's or early 80's. &amp;nbsp;We used it to signify a resource could complete the current task(s) but no new tasks could be started. &amp;nbsp;Draining the initiators was a common practice in the mainframe MVS world of batch job scheduling. &amp;nbsp;Probably still is.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=435630" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>